Biggest turn off

Discussion in 'Reader Polls' started by Hellbilly, Jul 19, 2009.

?

vote

  1. "Based on true story"

    6.5%
  2. Rated PG-13

    51.9%
  3. Remake

    39.0%
  4. Sequel

    2.6%
  1. Hellbilly

    Hellbilly Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2001
    Messages:
    14,183
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    38
    What are the most annoying factors about about recent horror movies?
     
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2009
  2. allmessedup

    allmessedup It's beer time.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    House on the Park of the Edge
    Going to go with sequel. I've enjoyed at least a few of the remakes...can't really think of any of the sequels I've liked all that much.
     
  3. Look's like I'm the first to choose the usually bullshitty "Based on a shockingly true story..." scenario, namely cause it usually mean's that the comment should be taken with more then just a little grain of salt, and that a giant shit-sandwhich is about to be shown on screen (as the movie, that is).
     
  4. Kim Bruun

    Kim Bruun Resident Scream Queen

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Denmark
    Sequel is actually a turn on for me. Chances are, if the original was good, the sequel will revisit what made it good. I liked Cold Prey II as much as I did Cold Prey.

    I went with PG-13, but only because there were so few choices. My biggest turn off would be "Direct to DVD."
     
  5. bwana the clown

    bwana the clown Supreme Ruler Of Sados

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2002
    Messages:
    2,346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Farthest Reaches Of The Downunderverse!
    :fire: REMAKES :fuck:

    I have no issue with the other three.
     
  6. othervoice1

    othervoice1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,447
    Likes Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Indiana
    Remakes- I am sick of them- I have no problem with non direct to dvd sequals and based on a true story is actually a plus to me no matter how loosely based it is. PG-13 doesnt bother me either if it is done right (like Drag Me to Hell). There are a few good remakes out there but I am just sick of them- they are remaking about everything ever made.
     
  7. msw7

    msw7 Re-animated member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,699
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Brigid Fitch, USA
    Rated PG-13 - not that there aren't good PG-13 horror movies, but I prefer balls-to-the-wall craziness in a horror movie, not the neutered crap you get when actors have to say "fudge", "shoot", "gosh-darn" in what should be very intense situations (to say nothing of neuticled gore and nudity).

    Some movies don't require language/gore/nudity to make their point, but for those that do, it's glaringly obvious (and painful to sit through) when it's been sanitized.
     
  8. soxfan666

    soxfan666 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    SW Florida
    PG-13 for me. It is the biggest turn off in terms or seeing it in the theater as I know that the most annoying shit head teenagers will be sitting near me.
     
  9. satans-sadists

    satans-sadists Ghost

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    8,285
    Likes Received:
    1,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Remakes top my list, though PG-13 rated remakes tend to be even worse.
     
  10. old-boo-radley

    old-boo-radley They stay the same age...

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,869
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Saskatchewan
    PG-13 because the movies nowadays aren't quite up to snuff and the lack of some crazy gore or tits for a cheap pop can make a meh movie devoid of entertainment. If it's good, it's good, but I find comfort in the R zone.

    A lot of people online like to hate people who are automatically against a PG-13 rating. While it's true you can't judge a movie by its rating, a PG-13 sequel to an R-rated film is understandably upsetting and I don't know about you, but I tend to R rated films more in general. The day movies are free, they can make The Beyond II rated G for all I care, but when I gotta drop $10, I'm not looking to take a chance on PG-13 slashers that were reviewed poorly. Let's be real, there's a good chance you will be burned going into something like that.
     
  11. rhett

    rhett Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Messages:
    9,395
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Canada
    PG-13, not because I need all my movies R, but usually these days a PG-13 is there because the studio requires it, not the story, and that's the wrong way to go about things.
     
  12. vampyr789

    vampyr789 9, 10. Never Sleep Again.

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,874
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Texas
    i just hate hearing "based on a true story" it never is...just crappy marketing
     
  13. Ash28M

    Ash28M Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,064
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON, Canada
    PG-13 - Back in the 70's and 80's it didn't feel like films compromised to get a PG rating and just felt like a natural rating for that film. Outside of Drag Me to Hell and the odd ghost film. PG-13 now a days usually means catering to to the studios. Going to the movies costs way to much now a days for that garbage.
     
  14. DrHerbertWest

    DrHerbertWest For Your Health

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Washington
    Easily remakes. PG-13 movies can be ok (I thought Haunting In Connecticut wasn't too bad and it was also "based on a true story") but the remakes simply rehash old movies with dashes of CGI or random 'omg! put down ur cellphonez!' scenes for kids, which I am not any more.
     
  15. X-human

    X-human I ate my keys

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,947
    Likes Received:
    687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Illinois
    Remakes. Not only because the original is guaranteed better, but because so many people come out of the woodwork saying "don't knock it till you've seen it." Yeah, I'm going to spend money one something I know will be crap instead of putting that money to good use like trying out an original indie or something. That makes a whole lof ot fucking sense. :fuck:

    The rest of the list doesn't even compare. Sequels? Meh. "Based on a true story"? It's an ad campaign out side of the filmmaker's control; I don't even watch trailers so I don't give a shit. PG-13, doubt the film really had a chance to be a hard-r anyways. Scripts like that are rarely just a few trims short of an R; they never really had it to begin with. Direct to video is the new frontier; theatricals are too overbloated to really have some meat. If you want it shown in a theater chain, hard R are pretty tame too.
     
  16. Workshed

    Workshed a.k.a. Villyan Shit

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,678
    Likes Received:
    1,368
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    London
    Anything can be "based on a true story," and all that message does for me is tell that I can look up the ending somewhere, and that it "grounds" the story in a way I'd rather not have in my Horror.
     
  17. allmessedup

    allmessedup It's beer time.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    House on the Park of the Edge
    Some of my favorite horror films were "Based on a True Story..." TCM comes to mind. I don't see that as anything new.

    The remakes get tiresome, but I have enjoyed some of them, so I can't put that one down. I usually end up seeing them when they come out, and there have been some crappy ones but I've enjoyed others.

    Haven't liked any of the sequels in recent years.
     
  18. fceurich39

    fceurich39 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Ira's Toys store
    agreed and on the remake side i look forward to em because most remakes prompt new dvd releases of the original films like stepfather,my bloody valentine uncut and the friday the 13th movie series getting deluxe editions

    here's hoping to a nightmare on elm street series special editions when the remake comes out next year
     
  19. CrazyFatEthel

    CrazyFatEthel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Rowlett, Texas
    I really need to combine my answer, I voted for PG-13, but to be specific it needs to be PG-13 Remakes.
     
  20. Harry Warden

    Harry Warden Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,848
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania
    Sequels are usually pretty lousy. That's my choice.
     

Share This Page