Horror or Not? #6 - Silence of the Lambs

Discussion in 'Reader Polls' started by spawningblue, Sep 23, 2006.

?

Poll #6 Horror of Not? - Silence of the Lambs

  1. Yes

    15 vote(s)
    36.6%
  2. No

    26 vote(s)
    63.4%
  1. DVD-fanatic-9

    DVD-fanatic-9 And the Next Morning, When the Campers Woke Up...

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    411
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Horror
    Less Than Zero - everyone in that movie was rich.
     
  2. Angelman

    Angelman OCD Blu Ray Collector

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,585
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I meant what's not horror about Silence of the Lambs. Definitely horror.
     
    DVD-fanatic-9 likes this.
  3. DVD-fanatic-9

    DVD-fanatic-9 And the Next Morning, When the Campers Woke Up...

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    411
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Horror
    BOO! You ruined my joke.

    I still stick by my answer, 100%.
     
    Angelman likes this.
  4. Anaestheus

    Anaestheus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    63
    So, "Face/Off" and "Something About Mary"? :)

    A bit more seriously, this is why I prefer a definition that distances itself from the imagery. There's plenty of "horrific" imagery in films that are certainly not horror films. "Men in Black" has most of the things in your list and I don't think anyone would call that a horror movie. Although, that awful rap tune might give you some fodder for argument.
     
    Workshed likes this.
  5. Erick H.

    Erick H. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I always tend to settle the "is it a horror film or a thriller" argument (which crops up a lot)with a question of intent. Does this movie try to scare you, not a cheap "boo" type scare, but a sick, pit of the stomach scare , something primal ? I would say in that regard, SILENCE qualifies. There are far too many scenes in that film that go well beyond where they need to to satisfy the "crime movie''element. We know Hannibal Lector is a twisted serial killer, we've been told from the outset,we don't need to actually see that Hannibal has flayed a man alive and strung him us as a decorative ornament in his cell to reinforce the point. That was done to mortify the audience. That's horror.

    SILENCE was following in the wake of Michael Mann's adaptation of the novel RED DRAGON, titled MANHUNTER. That film has violence and a great deal of style but it's primary purpose is to solve the mystery, explain who the murderer is and why he's doing what he's doing. It has great jolts but it doesn't go so deep into the well as SILENCE does for it's attempt to instill dread. Look at each film's introduction of Lector. In Mann's film Lector is a quiet, unassuming fellow first seen in a bright white room, it's striking but it is "natural". In Demme's SILENCE, Hannibal is introduced in a DUNGEON, bare stone walls, it looks like some place Boris Karloff would have entertained uninvited quests. Add to this, the way Lector interacts. In MANHUNTER ,Brian Cox is low key, civil, intelligent, he's supposed to be a great psychiatrist and we believe , yeah, people could go to this guy and never dream he was a lunatic. Anthony Hopkins (who is terrific fun to watch) on the other hand is standing with an unsettling rictus smile and has a delivery that should raise BIG red flags that maybe, just maybe, seeing his bill is not gonna be the worst thing that happens to his patients. Anyone who goes to him, and sighs with relief, "Ah, at last I'm in the hands of a competent professional !" is an idiot. He's clearly nuts !

    "Psychological thriller" is a term that is often used by big budget studio films and A-list directors so that don't have to admit that they sullied their reputation by admitting that they directed a horror film."Serious" actors love the term too, because they associate horror with slashers and monster movies and other genres they consider to be beneath them. But often , if you scrape off the veneer of studio gloss you find a humble little horror picture at the heart of your Oscar contender. You certainly don't HAVE to see SILENCE OF THE LAMBS as horror, but you certainly CAN.Also, if you see as many kids on Halloween night dressed up as Hannibal Lector as you do Freddy Krueger, that's pretty telling.
     
    Harry Warden and DVD-fanatic-9 like this.
  6. DVD-fanatic-9

    DVD-fanatic-9 And the Next Morning, When the Campers Woke Up...

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    411
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Horror
    True.

    But, as far as I'm concerned, "psychological horror" is also a legit subgenre that's been with us as far back as Psycho, Repulsion, Peeping Tom, potentially Eyes Without a Face. I believe the original Cat People also qualifies. Maybe Freaks as well. (Otherwise, we're really saying living people with deformities are horrifying instead of just "not like us.") I never heard anyone say "psychological horror isn't a thing." Or that it's just dressed-up "psychological thriller." In fact... I always thought "psychological thriller" was a kind of label A-listers also used to re-brand erotic thrillers like Basic Instinct, Fatal Attraction, and Sliver. Etc. Except, of course I remember films like Portrait of Jennie, Sorry Wrong Number, Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte, Picture of Dorian Gray, Death Takes a Holiday, etc. "Psychological" or "supernatural thriller" would likely be a fair label for some or all of the films of that ilk.
     
    Erick H. likes this.
  7. Erick H.

    Erick H. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I would certainly say that "psychological horror" is a legit genre, as is "psychological thriller". Both terms though are often used by studios/directors/actors who are loathe to use the "horror film" label because they find the genre disreputable. A number of "horror" directors have said that their genre is seen by many in the industry as being only one notch above pornography (apologies to porn enthusiasts, their words, not mine).There are, sadly, a lot of people who look on horror with utter contempt.
     
    DVD-fanatic-9 likes this.
  8. Harry Warden

    Harry Warden Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,848
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania
    Yeah, I agree...and isn't that sad. Some people are so embarrassed to star in them, and then there are actors who do so anyway and don't give a shit what others think. I like actors and directors that are versatile. Also, for all of those folks who think porn is so easy to do, when was the last time you kept an erection for hours..:p. Seriously, how on earth can people create porn and make it look as decent as it does. Shit, I don't look down on horror or porn. Of course, I am a self proclaimed horror and porn enthusiast. :D.
     
    Erick H. likes this.
  9. Harry Warden

    Harry Warden Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,848
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania

Share This Page