The Hills Have Eyes Aja VS Craven

Discussion in 'Reader Polls' started by Ash28M, Mar 13, 2006.

?

The Hills Have Eyes 1977 VS 2006

  1. Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes (1977)

    54.0%
  2. Alexandre Aja's The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

    46.0%
  1. Ash28M

    Ash28M Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,064
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON, Canada
    Did Alexandre Aja improve on Wes Craven's 1977 Cult classic? Which version is the best?
     
  2. BloodMan

    BloodMan Kill Time B4 It Kills You

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    4,442
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
  3. Noto

    Noto Guest

    You know, I haven't even seen Aja's remake yet and I still have a pretty good idea how I am going to vote.
     
  4. Alien Redrum

    Alien Redrum New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Derry
    2006.

    While both have their strengths and weaknesses, the 2006 is overall a much better flick.
     
  5. Cujo108

    Cujo108 Guest

    While I rather enjoyed Aja's version, Craven's classic still reigns supreme.
     
  6. onebyone

    onebyone Guest

    2006 for me. The original provides a few laughable moments, but that's about it.
     
  7. rhett

    rhett Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Messages:
    9,395
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Canada
    Craven's...not even close.
     
  8. MorallySound

    MorallySound Mad Mutilator

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2004
    Messages:
    7,143
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Canada
    Just saw the remake tonight. But still, I gotta go with Craven's.
     
  9. evildeadfan123

    evildeadfan123 Sam & Dean Winchester

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Missouri
    I saw the remake Saturday morning, and have to go with Craven's version. The remake was pretty good, but the original was better.
     
  10. eric_angelus

    eric_angelus Testacular

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,944
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Framingham, MA
    I love the Craven version, but voted for the remake, which really blew me away.
     
  11. DrHerbertWest

    DrHerbertWest For Your Health

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,004
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Washington
    I really enjoyed the update to the film but I always go with the original, because it's just that... the original. One more vote for Wes Craven, but a big thumbs up to Aja.
     
  12. Ash28M

    Ash28M Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,064
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON, Canada
    I know what you mean. It's easier to remake a film when you already have it laid out for you, then to make one from scratch. I just think Aja just did a superb job with it. He made it into the film that I wish the original had been.
     
  13. fceurich39

    fceurich39 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,781
    Likes Received:
    480
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ira's Toys store
    aja's version is better
     
  14. KillerCannabis

    KillerCannabis Slow, Deep & Hard

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2000
    Messages:
    5,609
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    So Cal
    As much as I love Craven's version, this is one of those rare times that I feel the sequel actually improved upon the elements of the original. It was more intense, more graphic and much more satisfying for a gorehound such as myself.
     
  15. Tien21

    Tien21 Guest

    I went with Aja's version. I think it improved somewhat from the original, but it still could have improved on more. I didn't think the RV explosion was very well thought out, and executed, but maybe i just need to see it again.
     
  16. Rocker416

    Rocker416 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I saw Aja's version Friday night........very good film. I thought it was intense and had some good twists of it's own.
    That being said, I still voted for Craven's original. Maybe because it was one of the first horror films I saw in a theater, I don't know, but for me, the original was a scarier experience.
     
  17. tobaccoman

    tobaccoman White, Proud, and Stupid

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,820
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I saw the new one on Saturday and I have to say I like them equally. I was hoping for a lot more from this new one though, but it was rather boring for me. The mutants were good and the action parts were wonderful, but it offered very little in the way of surprises. I think it would have fared much better had I never seen the original. If I hadn't already been exposed to the story this one would have probably been a lot better to me, but it was still pretty decent. I don't think either of them are neccisarily all that great though. I already own the original and will probably buy the remake used.
     
  18. betterdan

    betterdan Guest

    While the new one was decent enough Craven's version was still better. Like tobaccoman said, if I had never seen the original I probably would have loved the remake more.
     
  19. Ash28M

    Ash28M Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,064
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON, Canada
    14/14 this looks like the closest old version VS new verson poll we've had yet.
     
  20. badnewsbrown

    badnewsbrown Guest

    .
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 23, 2006

Share This Page