the new Dario Argento film "DRACULA" in 3D?!

Discussion in 'Euro Horror' started by Crystal Plumage, May 13, 2010.

  1. Shannafey

    Shannafey Don't Monkey With Me!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    6,941
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Florida, But Far from the Hell that is Miami
    I liked it MUCH MORE than Phantom!!
     
  2. Christy

    Christy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Have to agree with The Chaostar excellent commentary. Dracula is depressing please Argento no more movies!
     
  3. Crystal Plumage

    Crystal Plumage Dig me..but don't bury me

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,029
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    The Court of the Crimson King
  4. Crystal Plumage

    Crystal Plumage Dig me..but don't bury me

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,029
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    The Court of the Crimson King
    Dracula was OK in my book. I didn't particularly like the look of it, but at least it had some of that old Italian Gothic to it.
    Rutger Hauer was underused IMO.
     
  5. Demoni

    Demoni Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
  6. Cydeous

    Cydeous Axxon N

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    La Casa Maledetta
    I really hope that Lynch starts making movies again. He's at the top of my list as well. I liked Cronenberg's latest movie Cosmopolis even though it wasn't as good as Videodrome and Naked Lunch. I was even good with The Ward by Carpenter. Those movies might not be at the top of the heap in the oeuvre of their respective directors but at least they had decent acting. Cosmopolis was actually quite good. Argento, unfortunately, has just lost it completely. I loved his earlier works all the way up to and including The Stendhal Syndrome. Then the quality dropped and the movies became just ok (Phantom was horrible). Dracula was just terrible. It was badly acted, the CGI was nasty, and the whole movie was just unnecessary. I hope he turns it around but I lost all hope after this one.
     
  7. f.ramses

    f.ramses sociopath

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    region 0
    I agree about the disappointment that was Argento's Dracula but I was dissappointed because of the fact that it wasn't entertaining in a bad movie kind of way. I pretty much gave up on ever seeing anything good again from Argento after Mother of Tears but Dracula sounded so bad that I thought it would be absolutely hilarious and I was really looking forward to seeing it for that reason alone. Sadly, it didn't even work in that way for me.
     
  8. sade

    sade Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I agree it's sad to see the decline of D.A. Watching Dracula was like seeing an Ed Wood flick :)
     
  9. shape22

    shape22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,800
    Likes Received:
    336
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I can't say I agree with this. Wood's films at least crackle with enthusiasm. That makes the ineptitude charming and funny. The lack of basic film-making skills and the laughable budgets are apparent in every frame. But you can feel the joy of the participants. Even an old pro like Bela Lugosi looks like he's there for more than a pay check.

    F. ramses hit it on the head. The trailers made this film look like it would be a so-bad-it's-good-laugh-a-minute minor masterpiece along the lines of Plan 9. But Argento's Dracula isn't bad in an entertaining way. It's just stillborn. If it contained more ridiculous moments like the praying mantis scene or the town hall massacre scene it could have been fun. But it's such a perfunctory and phoned-in take on a story that's already been beaten to death. Not even a master scenery chewer like Rutger Hauer was able to bring it to life for long. I can't imagine any reason for its existence other than pure greed.

    Simonetti and Argento have done sloppy work before. But I've never gotten such a half-assed vibe from any of their prior collaborations. These guys appear to have lost all interest in conjuring movie magic. Dracula 3d is pure product.
     
  10. The Chaostar

    The Chaostar Johnny Hallyday forever

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2000
    Messages:
    4,291
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Hell-as
    Great observations there.
     
  11. CPT HOOK

    CPT HOOK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    5,897
    Likes Received:
    718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    US
    Already streaming on NetFlix.
     
  12. cjg

    cjg Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2001
    Messages:
    1,043
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    iowa
    Down to $12.96 at Amazon. DVD $ 9.96.
     
  13. Katatonia

    Katatonia Hellbound Heart

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Messages:
    20,586
    Likes Received:
    1,349
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Missouri
    Geez, this was pretty damned bad. :eek1: :eek1: It's almost hard to believe Argento actually made this one. I've seen just about every Dracula film adaptation there's ever been, and this would rank near the bottom...easily.

    I thought the Cinematography was especially horrible throughout the film. Every scene that should have appeared darker simply looked artificially lit up. Most cheap DTV films have better cinematography than this film did!

    And then there was the inept CGI which looked like it came from the early 2000's... certainly didn't help matters any.

    Thomas Kretschmann and Rutger Hauer did pretty solid jobs with what they had to work with. They at least saved the film from being a total disgrace. Even Asia Argento was pretty bad in this one.

    And I swear the music score for this one was a virtual total ripoff from some other film score...but I just can't quite pin it.
     
  14. dave13

    dave13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5,478
    Likes Received:
    474
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Those were the two moments that stood out for me as well. The effects were lousy in both of them, but there was a wackiness and energy that the rest of the film was hugely lacking. When that's present, I can forgive the worst of effects. It's what makes a terrible film like Birdemic worth watching, and what gives it some entertainment value. Aside from those two scenes (and maybe the completely gratuitous Lucy-takes-a-sponge-bath scene), this movie was incredibly dull.

    It felt like the actors were participating in a staging or lighting exercise, reading their lines in a monotone while the crew did their thing. Rutger Hauer in particular looked and sounded like he was under sedation. Each line delivery felt like it was a confused question, as though he were completely unsure of where he was or what he was doing there.

    Re-reading this thread is more entertaining than the movie. The hope and cautious optimism of the early posts seems tragic in retrospect.
     
  15. Anaestheus

    Anaestheus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I agree with this. But, I wonder if Argento was trying to compensate for the lost light resulting with the 3D glasses. Granted, that implies that at least some thought went on while this was being made and I really don't see much evidence of that anywhere else.

    It also seems like the actors didn't know that camera was running. At times, it seems like everyone thought this was a dress rehearsal.
     
  16. Katatonia

    Katatonia Hellbound Heart

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Messages:
    20,586
    Likes Received:
    1,349
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Missouri
    I guess that is a possibility, but if that's indeed the case it turned out horribly in 2D. I just thought the entire film looked horribly inept and amateurish.
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2014
  17. Paff

    Paff Super Moderator

    Joined:
    May 14, 2000
    Messages:
    8,064
    Likes Received:
    398
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    SoCal
    Arriving this week from Netflix, so I can check out the suckitude for myself.
     
  18. MisterTwister

    MisterTwister The Schlock King

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,068
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Lake Wales, FL
    I can't bring myself to watch this. After Hitchcock, Mother of Tears and Giallo I told myself I would never watch a shitty Argento movie again.
     
  19. wago70

    wago70 Surviving on nostalgia

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2001
    Messages:
    3,586
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    San Francisco - down by them two ol' sheds
    I haven't seen any of them after readin' these blogs and posts. I did, however, really really like "JENIFER" which I thought was well made, really twisted and the violence actually disturbed me.
     
  20. MisterTwister

    MisterTwister The Schlock King

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,068
    Likes Received:
    1,106
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Lake Wales, FL
    I forgot about that one. Really dug it as well.
     

Share This Page