Which 80's horror vet's movies hold up best today?

Discussion in 'Site Polls' started by rhett, Jun 27, 2010.

?

Which Modern Horror Director's Classics Hold Up Best Today?

Poll closed Jul 27, 2010.
  1. Dario Argento

    8 vote(s)
    7.0%
  2. John Carpenter

    51 vote(s)
    44.7%
  3. Wes Craven

    5 vote(s)
    4.4%
  4. David Cronenberg

    30 vote(s)
    26.3%
  5. Brian De Palma

    2 vote(s)
    1.8%
  6. Lucio Fulci

    3 vote(s)
    2.6%
  7. Tobe Hooper

    2 vote(s)
    1.8%
  8. George A. Romero

    13 vote(s)
    11.4%
  1. Harry Warden

    Harry Warden Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,848
    Likes Received:
    1,105
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania
    Carpenter.
     
  2. Ash28M

    Ash28M Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,064
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON, Canada
    Yeah I agree with Rhett on all his points. I do think Halloween is overrated but it still has so much going for it that the average slasher doesn't, comparing it to stuff like Final Exam is ludicrous. As for it being dated, I have never seen that as negative. Most of my favorite Horror films i.e Carrie, Exorcist, TCM, Evil Dead, The Shining look their time period. That doesn't make them any less amazing.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2010
  3. Body Boy

    Body Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,000
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Sorry. I don't see Halloween as anything amazing. I will admit that Sean Cunningham didn't know what he was doing, and the cinematography was a complete fluke on the film's part. I mean, for what was going on behind the scenes, F13 is quite a spectacle. But Halloween just feels so dry, I can hardly get into it. Some scenes are nice, but...no. I seriously don't see the care in it. A killer breaks out of a loony bin and attacks a random girl and her friends. On a night that is certainly no Halloween I've ever seen. Nada...I respect peoples' views and love for the films and its series, but I can't get behind it when it just feels so 'blah' to me. :( Sorry.
     
  4. Matt89

    Matt89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,673
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Toronto
    Yeah man I actually think you're being seriously harsh on Halloween. Final Exam is a steaming pile of shit (the only reason I've held onto my DVD of it is because it's now extremely rare). But nah, you can't compare it to trash like that. Its cinematography I think is one of the things the film still has going for it. When I said I think it's dated, I meant that it's become very cliche, and that's not necessarily the film's fault. Because of its success, it was copied (much like the way Friday the 13th did) over and over and over and thus, the content of Halloween has become extremely cliche. But the cinematography in Friday the 13th is crap. I mean, the scenery is nicer because it takes place in the woods, but other than that....ugh. Friday the 13th is a terrible film, with shitty acting, poor production values (just compare it with part 2 and you'll see the differences, Friday the 13th Part 2 being a glossier, more professional-looking film). Friday the 13th has dated much worse, as it exemplifies the cliches of slasher films. Halloween has dated, but Friday the 13th is just campy, corny, 100% fromage. Okay, the killer's a woman. So what? It's really not that good a film. While I think Halloween gets too much credit, I think you're not giving it enough. It's a well-made film, it's just become very cliche'd.

    Films like The Shining, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Thing, Carrie, Scanners, Videodrome, The Dead Zone, The Fly, etc IMO hold up MUCH MUCH better than Halloween. Even Black Christmas I think holds up better. Sure ALL these films "look their age", but I think that's more from a cinematographic sense. The content of Halloween is what's dated.

    ~Matt
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2010
  5. Matt89

    Matt89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,673
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Toronto
    Oh yeah, and you gotta give Halloween credit for the opening scene that's one long take (although he pretty much stole that idea from Welles' Touch of Evil, but whatever).

    ~Matt
     
  6. MacReady

    MacReady New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Hey, Sweden!
    Carpenter.

    Dead Ringers (1988) ......... Halloween
    The Fly (1986)............ The Thing
    The Dead Zone (1983)........ Escape from New York
    Videodrome (1983)........... The Fog
    Scanners (1981) ............. Christine, Prince of Darkness, They Live, Big Trouble in Little China

    No question.
     
  7. Matt89

    Matt89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,673
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Toronto
    What does that even mean?

    ~Matt
     
  8. SaviniFan

    SaviniFan I Have A Fetish

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    5,788
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    On the cutting room floor.
    I have no idea myself. :eek2:
     
  9. dave13

    dave13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    475
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    I understand what you're saying, but i gotta disagree on pretty much every count. the only one that comes close it the thing...but its up against the fly, which is one of cronenbergs best. its still just no contest.
     
  10. Body Boy

    Body Boy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,000
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    I guess we will agree to disagree.
    I mean, the acting in F13 isn't great, but Halloween's isn't either. Annie and Bob and don't shoot me, but even Loomis are filled with awkwardness, overreaching and camp value. But whatever...moving on...
     
  11. Matt89

    Matt89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,673
    Likes Received:
    944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Toronto
    Explain it to me then? Is this a "this movie vs that movie" kinda thing? Because honestly...it still makes no sense. Why would you compare The Fog with Videodrome? What the hell? And Christine, Prince of Darkness, They Live and Big Trouble in Little China with Scanners???

    I don't mean to be such a dick, I just can't understand the logic or reasoning here.

    ~Matt
     
  12. Hatchetwarrior

    Hatchetwarrior Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,791
    Likes Received:
    352
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Farmingdale, New York
    A tie between Carpenter & Cronenberg for me, so I won't be voting.
     
  13. Erick H.

    Erick H. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Are we just considering their 80's output here ? I kind of lost the thread when HALLOWEEN came into the picture.

    If you are strictly talking about the 80's I'll give Carpenter a slight edge,his output was wider and I think more consistant.If we are covering their whole body of work,that's a different story.
     
  14. Anthropophagus

    Anthropophagus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,046
    Likes Received:
    383
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Canada
    Carpenter, watched The Fog just last night.
     
  15. dave13

    dave13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    5,479
    Likes Received:
    475
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    yeah, thats what i was going with....*shrug*
     
  16. Anaestheus

    Anaestheus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    63
    While I doubt this will change anyone's vote, I thought I'd point out a couple of the things Rhett has said about the poll. He asks which director's horror films have aged the best. And he specifically said that he excluded Raimi because so much of his work has been out of the genre. To me that means that this would include films like Halloween and Naked Lunch, and exclude things like Big Trouble and Eastern Promises. And, while we are voting on a director, if you think that TCM has stood the test of time better than any other film, then I guess you would vote for Hooper, even if you thought that the rest of his stuff was crap. I chose Cronenberg because I think Brood, Fly and Videodrome haven't lost any of their power. As much as I love Carpenter and Argento, I think Cronenberg's best is fresher than theirs. As good as Halloween is, I have to admit that it has lost a bit of its edge due to all the copycats. Likewise with Argento.
     
  17. msw7

    msw7 Re-animated member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,699
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Brigid Fitch, USA
    i agree with you about Carpenter (one reason I didn't vote for him), but for me Suspiria has held up far better than the Fly, for example. Maybe the foreign setting (foreign to me, as an American), helps offset some of the datedness.

    I just watched the Fly again recently, and the bit towards the end where it kind of turns into a superhero/action movie (when Brundlefly kidnaps Geena Davis) just screams 80s to me. On the other hand, Cronenberg was never my favorite, so that might color my perception too.
     
  18. Workshed

    Workshed a.k.a. Villyan Shit

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,666
    Likes Received:
    1,362
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    London
    Cronenberg, Cronenberg, Cronenberg.

    As others have said, a few of Carpenter's films feel very dated to me, whereas Cronenberg's grow more disturbing with every viewing.
     
  19. Darryl Revok

    Darryl Revok New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Marion, IA
    Cronenberg. Hands down. I can watch The Fly over and over again and it STILL has some of the best effects, and its still fucking disgusting even in 2010.
     
  20. Criswell

    Criswell New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Outside your Bedroom Window.
    I would love to have said Dario, but the poor dubbing of the time is just not done today, as Subs are much more accepted.

    Carpenter.............close, but only cause he newer films were not that good.

    I'd have to say Cronenberg if only cause his anti- body, anti-medical/establishement themese are still relevant.
     

Share This Page