Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Reader Polls' started by VideoViolence, Jan 25, 2005.
Which of these do you think is the worst sequel??
The second one. I actually enjoy all the others on some level. The flashbacks in #2 are just too annoying though, and the rest of the film isn't that fun either.
5....mickey rooney is a wrinkle on the scrotum of the world!
5 blew goats...they were all pretty bad, yet oddly entertaining except for 5.
Part 2. Haven't seen Parts 4 and 5 yet.
Part 2, been a while since I have seen the other sequels.
I like them all for the cheese factor, but I went with 5.
I have only seen 2 and 4 but I can't imagine anything being worse than 2
Part 5 Is Worst Then Part 3,4,2
Part 3 is on my top 5 worst horror movies.
I Thought Part 2 Is The Best Sequel In This Series
Never seen part 1 or part 5 but i believe Part 2 was terrible, some of the worst acting i have ever seen.
Part 2, only because I didn't see the other ones.
i think all of them are awfull,the first one was ok
Three, three, it is just so very much part three. I mean, what was going on with his head anyway? Bad, bad, bad movie.
Part 3 was the worst of the entire lot of shitty sequals. :fuck:
yes ,part three was awful,i just watched the ending because i couldnt take watching it,are the rest of the sndn's going to be released on dvd , i would buy them just to own them.
I have to say first of all that I haven't seen 4 or 5, so I can't comment there. I also love the first one-one of my all time favorite slashers. Part 2 is at least very funny in spots and a thumbs up in my book despite the incredible amount of flashback footage, which may actually in some twisted way add to its so bad it's good appeal for me. Part 3, on the other hand, is just absolute shit from beginning to its excrciating ending-I love bill Mosely, but he must have been in dire need of some cash to appear in this abombination.
Part 3 Was Absolutly Awful