PDA

View Full Version : Wicker Man's leg-lopping mystery


RyanPC
11-25-2006, 07:04 PM
From BBC News:

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42348000/jpg/_42348910_stumps203.jpg

A Galloway landmark left by a cult 1970s movie has been chopped down.

Wooden legs from a figure set alight in the final scenes of The Wicker Man had remained in their concrete bases at Burrowhead for some 30 years.

Investigations have started after the legs - standing about 5ft high - were sawn down and removed, leaving two stumps in the ground.

The site is now on a holiday village run by Stuart Fairclough, who said the landmark was a popular attraction.

"I got phone calls at the start of the week saying 'do you realise that the stumps have gone'?" he said.

"It would seem to be at the latter end of last week and apart from that we are all in the dark."

He added that in his three years running the holiday village he had received hundreds of inquiries about the legs.

Dumfries-based film historian Mark McLachlan said the movie did have some passionate fans.

"Over the last 10 years the Wicker Man has had a second life," he said.

"It has spawned a remake and the Wickerman festival."

He said it was not impossible that somebody wanted to have a permanent memento from the film.

Two stumps

"I suppose it is owning a piece of film history," he said.

"But to come all this way to steal two stumps of wood is madness."

However, he said that there was a community of Wicker Man fans.

"You see it online, you see it at film festivals, you see it at the festival down here," he said.

"The film has many fans who do very many strange things."

He called upon the local council and other groups to help come up with a plan to replace the missing legs.

"I think this will have an effect, not only on the holiday village, it is the image of the Wicker Man and its place in Dumfries and Galloway," he said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotland/6176828.stm

Franco
11-25-2006, 07:47 PM
Those assholes deserve to have their hands cutted with a saw for doing that!

Hey, that beach over there gets hot in summer or not that much? It looked nice in the movie... :)

MrVess
11-25-2006, 08:20 PM
Coming soon to ebay.co.uk... :D

SaviniFan
11-25-2006, 08:30 PM
I think it's Anchor Bay. They will be releasing individual slivers with your 6th dip release from them.

dwatts
11-25-2006, 08:33 PM
Mystery solved - some losers stole them to ruin a bit of history, and to deny film fans a unique experience. Scum bags.

Shokk
11-25-2006, 09:03 PM
I think it's Anchor Bay. They will be releasing individual slivers with your 6th dip release from them.

:lol: :lol:

Though it could be true..:eek2:

RyanPC
11-25-2006, 09:19 PM
I think it's Anchor Bay. They will be releasing individual slivers with your 6th dip release from them.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Mystery solved - some losers stole them to ruin a bit of history, and to deny film fans a unique experience. Scum bags.

I agree. This is a travesty. :(

Luna
11-25-2006, 09:57 PM
Aww, that's a shame. :(

Workshed
11-25-2006, 10:01 PM
Like, even if you are a huge fan of the film(s), what the hell are you going to do with two legs? Hump them?

Luna
11-25-2006, 10:12 PM
Maybe it was to protest the new version and the laughable "OWW MY LEGS!!!"scene?

dwatts
11-26-2006, 12:47 AM
That would only make them bigger idiots...

Deus Ex Machina
11-26-2006, 01:31 AM
I agree. This is a travesty. :(

...no

A travesty is the fate of the negative

RyanPC
11-26-2006, 02:25 AM
...no

A travesty is the fate of the negative

Well damn, I guess I've been using that word incorrectly all this time. Thanks for correcting me. :)

Livingdead102
11-26-2006, 04:50 AM
To be honest, I'm amazed they stayed there as long as they did. It's still a shame.

Erick H.
11-26-2006, 08:36 AM
What pricks !

Numania
11-26-2006, 06:37 PM
I don't know if I would go as far as to say it's a shame.
Sure, it stinks for the land owner that his property was taken, but they're just fuckin' stumps. You could still go there and use your imagination.

Livingdead102
11-26-2006, 08:37 PM
I don't know if I would go as far as to say it's a shame.

Sure it is. A piece of one-of-a-kind memorabilia from a classic film was stolen. I'd say that's a shame.

Or would that be two pieces of two-of-a-kind memorabilia?