Jeepers Creepers 3

[boycrieswolf]

** JEEPERS CREEPERS III CATHEDRAL: The third chapter of the saga created by Victor Salva is ready to fly. “The script, now titled JEEPERS CREEPERS III CATHEDRAL, is about to enter preproduction at MGM and does include a prologue in the Old West where we see how the Creeper became a frightening part of cowboy and Native American folklore,” Salva told Fangoria. For the third assault, one of the best screen creatures of recent years comes back even more fetishist and disturbing than ever. After a brief stop in the past, the script picks up exactly where JEEPERS II left off, with a new 23rd spring only a day away. “I will say,” Salva reveals, “that one aspect of the third film features Trish Jenner [again played by Gina Philips from the original film], who, 23 years later, has a teenage son of her own, named Darry after her long lost brother. Trish is having a terrible recurring dream where her son meets the same terrible fate as her brother. Now a rich and powerful woman, Trish is determined to stop the Creeper once and for all.”

Salva, who contributed the IN SICKNESS & IN HEALTH episode of FEAR ITSELF this summer, is really excited about the story and promises a lot of surprises. “The other elements of the story, which easily make JEEPERS CREEPERS III the biggest film of the three, include some of the scariest and most intense Creeper stuff we have ever attempted,” he says. As for the word “CATHEDRAL” appearing in the title, the director doesn’t want to explain the enigma but he notes that “it is a large part of the film created especially for all our loyal JEEPERS CREEPERS fans. The new film brings back all the classic ideas of the first film, but brings them horrifyingly full circle. It also revisits characters from both films [Ray Wise from II returns, as does Creeper actor Jonathan Breck], lets us learn more about what the Creeper is and, by popular demand, reintroduces the infamous Creeper truck.” What else do you want from a JEEPERS CREEPERS movie?! (thanks to Fangoria.com)

[Ptflea2]

wonder if this will get a wide theater release or direct to DVD?

[fattyjoe37]

I was a big fan of the first movie, but the second was very disappointing. Continuing the story started in part 1 is a move in the right direction. I'll check this out.

[dwatts]

wonder if this will get a wide theater release or direct to DVD?

It'll go direct to the bargain bin.

[boycrieswolf]

It'll go direct to the bargain bin.

...I'm not so sure...didn't they make a buttload of money? (off of the 1st one at least...) This may be decent but I'm not exactly holding my breath. Just thought I'd post it for those who might be interested. Cheers!:D

[maybrick]

I give this thread 10 more posts.

[bigdaddyhorse]

First movie was great, second was airight.
This actually sounds really cool, hopefully it's not a DTV shitfest although I wouldn't bet against it.

[aoiookami]

I've enjoyed both so far, I'll check out the third one for sure. The Creeper is one of the more interesting movie monsters, and I'm all for creature features...

[dwatts]

didn't they make a buttload of money? (off of the 1st one at least...)

:lol: Never a truer word.

[fceurich39]

the 2nd one i remember knocked freddy vs jason off the 1 spot at box office when it debuted i have a feeling it will probably go theatrical but better not be PG-13

[MorallySound]

I liked the first, but the second Jeepers Creepers was one of the worst movies I had ever seen. Let's hope the third will be at least decent.

[Myron Breck]

:sleepy:
I'll pass.

[othervoice1]

I really enjoyed the first one, the second one I found to kinda boring and poorly scripted. If the third could kinda fall in the middle it would at least be watchable.

[DrHerbertWest]

First one rocked, second one had some moments. Count me in!

[The Chaostar]

Creeper is a good monster. First film was excellent, the second one was... weird to say the least, but I still enjoyed it - and it had a provocative.... thing about it.

Will be there for the third film. Will Francis Ford Coppola produce it?

[baggio]

Salva reveals, “that one aspect of the third film features Trish Jenner [again played by Gina Philips from the original film], who, 23 years later, has a teenage son of her own, named Darry after her long lost brother.

Ahh, how much you wanna bet the teenage son & his friends will be shirtless at some point of the movie.

[maybrick]

Ahh, how much you wanna bet the teenage son & his friends will be shirtless at some point of the movie.

Wow, ten posts on the nose! Where's my Kewpie doll? I knew somebody wouldn't be able to resist bringing up a certain subject when a thread is made regarding Salva. Thanks, Baggio!

[onebyone]

Is that "certain subject" the ridiculously high, Quentin Tarantino wouldnt even show us this many feet, number of shirtless male shots that filled Jeepers Creepers 2, or his conviction for lewd and lascivious conduct, oral copulation with a person under 14, and procuring a child for pornography?

[maybrick]

Is that "certain subject" the ridiculously high, Quentin Tarantino wouldnt even show us this many feet, number of shirtless male shots that filled Jeepers Creepers 2, or his conviction for lewd and lascivious conduct, oral copulation with a person under 14, and procuring a child for pornography?

Both are the same subject as far as I'm concerned. I doubt many people would have ever noticed the former if it wasn't for the latter.

[dwatts]

Wow, ten posts on the nose! Where's my Kewpie doll? I knew somebody wouldn't be able to resist bringing up a certain subject when a thread is made regarding Salva. Thanks, Baggio!

My reference to it in post 9 was too subtle, I guess. :lol:

[baggio]

Wow, ten posts on the nose! Where's my Kewpie doll? I knew somebody wouldn't be able to resist bringing up a certain subject when a thread is made regarding Salva. Thanks, Baggio!

I swear I didn't even get that hint.

My reference to it in post 9 was too subtle, I guess. :lol:

Very, very funny. Another post I missed the reference.



Anybody see Peaceful Warrior? Salva was on cloud 9. You can actually see the camera shaking. (just kidding)

[Rockmjd]

According to the Fear Itself thread, Salva should be forgiven because he is gay. :)

[Fumi]

Trish is having a terrible recurring dream where her son meets the same terrible fate as her brother.

Well, at least they've got the tiresomely clichéd part covered.

[BloodMan]

I hope Ray Wise doesn't get killed off... storywise he is an old old man now... but he was awesome... kicked so much ass in part II.. I'll watch it...

[maskull]

I've actually always hated the design of The Creeper, especially in the first one. That movie had some cool build up but when you actually saw The Creeper clearly, it sucked all the tension out of the movie (and made me laugh).

Even though the first film technically was the better film, and more of a horror flick, I actually find myself watching part 2 a lot more. There's only a few actually creepy scenes in it, but there's this fun, don't-take-this-film-too-seriously aspect to part 2 that I really enjoy. I hope that's the way the filmmakers meant this movie to be seen, but if not, why the hell would they cast Ray Wise? The hokey-ness of The Creeper worked better with this one too, because it was a hokey creature in a hokey movie, not a serious flick with a goofy creature.

Anyway, even though the write-up sounds a little bland, I'm sure I'll check out part three. I'm really not crazy about the nightmares about the son aspect of the movie, and bringing back the Creeper-mobile "by popular demand", worries me cause it seems that the man is making a movie based on what he thinks people want, rather than just doing his own thing and hoping people like it. So yeah, I'll prob end up renting it but I won't be expecting much from it. Hopefully that works out the way part 2 did.

[Shannafey]

Are they ever going to stop giving this child rapist work??

[Camp Blood]

Do you like Roman Polanski?

[Vlachio]

First movie was great, second was airight.
This actually sounds really cool, hopefully it's not a DTV shitfest although I wouldn't bet against it.

I wouldn't even plan on seeing this movie in theaters. Still I would want to see it eventually.

[Shannafey]

Do you like Roman Polanski?


Yeah, I know it is the same thing! Polanski is a better director, but they are both rapists and should really be treated the same way! The only difference is, Salva actually served time, but if you ask me, not enough! Actually if you ask me, he should be killed for that. If it was my child, he would have been!

[maybrick]

Broken record.

[Rockmjd]

This was probably posted many times before in other Jeepers Creepers threads, but I hadn't seen it until now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh8B-OI_1uQ
Jeepers Creepers/Unsolved Mysteries comparison.

[MorallySound]

This was probably posted many times before in other Jeepers Creepers threads, but I hadn't seen it until now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh8B-OI_1uQ
Jeepers Creepers/Unsolved Mysteries comparison.

Hahaha. Awesome.

[DVD-fanatic-9]

According to the Fear Itself thread, Salva should be forgiven because he is gay. :)
For your information, I'm not blind.


Broken record.
Thank you! This is not an issue anymore. People aren't even discussing this in a way that's relevant to the subject of pedophilia or child abuse - they're just using it to attack other people. "How dare people give this guy work?" - because maybe they're in the business to make money. And Jeepers Creepers made money. Is that what you're pissed about? Because I thought it was the kids being molested thing. If you're pissed about the money, blame Capitalism. Or "someone on this board wants to forgive the guy's crimes" - bullshit. You won't find one single member of this board who could forgive pedophilia - and why would you even insist that someone would? Could it be because you want someone to be the bad guy so you can attack them?

I'm sick and tired of hearing this brought up. Because someone always uses it to attack anyone who just wants to watch the freakin' movies. Or anyone who knows people like Salva might not exist if this fucking world were a little less repressive. Why else do you think pedophiles are so often physically unattractive people with serious social handicaps?? Why are the victims of these crimes people whom the rapists see as weak and meager and somewhat defenseless?

People aren't calling it like they see it. They want a fight. Because this has nothing to do with Hollywood - everyone knows their game. They would give anyone a job who they think would get them money! Exactly what changed when MGM released the Jeepers Creepers movies? Nothing! Why in your quest for revealing the truth did you never mention that this is just business as usual? Where is the blame for the businessmen who don't care what they sell?! This is no isolated incident. It happens all the time. And there is nothing more outrageous about this guy's post-1980's career than the usual crimes of businessmen.

[Rockmjd]

For your information, I'm not blind.
And? Your point is?

For the record, I couldn't care less about Salva's past. As long as he paid his debt to society, he can do whatever he wants. But lets not make excuses for him. He did wrong, was caught, and did his time, though imo not enough time.

[DVD-fanatic-9]

And? Your point is?
I think you know what my point is - you brought up the Fear Itself post, which you know I posted in, about this subject and again you know that, and I mentioned the fact that this guy gets more heat than most pedophiles because he's gay, which you also know.

And I'm not making excuses, and if you're going to insist that I am- you can take that crap outside and leave it there, because making excuses for what he did means I don't have a problem with pedophilia - which I do and I never even hinted at not having a problem with it.

[Rockmjd]

I think you know what my point is - you brought up the Fear Itself post, which you know I posted in, about this subject and again you know that, and I mentioned the fact that this guy gets more heat than most pedophiles because he's gay, which you also know.

And I'm not making excuses, and if you're going to insist that I am- you can take that crap outside and leave it there, because making excuses for what he did means I don't have a problem with pedophilia - which I do and I never even hinted at not having a problem with it.

First of all, as long as I'm not breaking any forum rules, I'll post however I please.
Secondly, I posted that almost a month ago. Like I remember who said what in that thread.

Now that I look at the fear itself thread, the quote that I originally was referencing was this
It happened 20 years ago and the guy was gay.
So the fuck what. But again, he is a free man and is entitled to make movies, so I'm not taking the side of the person who said he shouldn't make movies. He's free to do what he wants, and of course we are free to judge him on his crimes.

[DVD-fanatic-9]

First of all, as long as I'm not breaking any forum rules, I'll post however I please.
Oh yeah? Well, when you are addressing me or replying to me, you will show some damn respect. And it's not cool with me to tell me I'm making excuses for something criminal. That is an attack, and a bullshit one at that.

[Rockmjd]

Oh yeah? Well, when you are addressing me or replying to me, you will show some damn respect. And it's not cool with me to tell me I'm making excuses for something criminal. That is an attack, and a bullshit one at that.
You're the one who brought the subject up after it had died. I bumped this thread to talk about the actual movie. If you don't like the way the discussion is going, I suggest you stop talking about it. If you don't like my posts, I suggest you ignore them. I will do the same with yours. As for showing you respect? :lol: Respect is earned. I'm not the one who started this will some rant about being oppressed and discriminated and whatever other bs you decide to throw at us next.

[DVD-fanatic-9]

I resurrected this thread because I didn't know someone had attacked me in it. And because I had something to say. This is a message board after all. There are no rules about taking an opportunity to clear the air.

And if you're going to call oppression and discrimination bullshit, like it never happens - you'd better have some fucking life experience having those "thrown at you" before you act like they're not real.

[fceurich39]

just seen on facebook that it has a release date of june 1st 2013 I dunno if this is some late april fool's joke or what???? I heard back in December this was in post production I dunno what the heck is going on???

[fceurich39]

update seen this link here http://www.horror-movies.ca/jeepers-creepers-3-release-date/