Horror Digital Forum - View Single Post

Steel76 · 07-07-2012, 09:54 AM

The biggest problem with part 3 and 4 is the damn CGI gore.
Sure, part 4 had more practical to begin with, but then turned to CGI again.
I don´t understand why the hell ANYONE would use CGI gore in a movie, but the last few year, this has gotten worse and worse.
In part 3 the CGI FX didn´t even look like they had time to finish them.
Another problem with part 4 was that it took forever before the actual massacre began, and when your having a cast of worthless actors and characters trying to carry the movie, it quickly felt like a torture test sitting through the first 45-50 minutes.

Sure the acting in the classic slashers back in the 80:s wasn´t Oscars worthy, but these days it´s REALLY down to amateur/porn level.

I just hate that an fantastic and underrated slasher like "Wrong Turn" is getting buried beneath these crappy DTV sequels.

Oh well...

07-07-2012, 09:54 AM	#6
Steel76 Maniac Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Arvika, Sweden Posts: 538	The biggest problem with part 3 and 4 is the damn CGI gore. Sure, part 4 had more practical to begin with, but then turned to CGI again. I don´t understand why the hell ANYONE would use CGI gore in a movie, but the last few year, this has gotten worse and worse. In part 3 the CGI FX didn´t even look like they had time to finish them. Another problem with part 4 was that it took forever before the actual massacre began, and when your having a cast of worthless actors and characters trying to carry the movie, it quickly felt like a torture test sitting through the first 45-50 minutes. Sure the acting in the classic slashers back in the 80:s wasn´t Oscars worthy, but these days it´s REALLY down to amateur/porn level. I just hate that an fantastic and underrated slasher like "Wrong Turn" is getting buried beneath these crappy DTV sequels. Oh well... __________________ Watching my filthy collection on Super 8mm, VHS, Laserdisc, DVD and Blu-Ray.