|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What's the worst Hellraiser sequel? | |||
| Hellbound: Hellraiser II |
   
|
2 | 3.03% |
| Hellraiser III: Hell on Earth |
  
|
1 | 1.52% |
| Hellraiser: Bloodline |
  
|
2 | 3.03% |
| Hellraiser: Inferno |
  
|
3 | 4.55% |
| Hellraiser: Hellseeker |
  
|
5 | 7.58% |
| Hellraiser: Deader |
  
|
3 | 4.55% |
| Hellraiser: Hellworld |
|
7 | 10.61% |
| Hellraiser: Revelations |
|
18 | 27.27% |
| I gave up on the series after the first few flicks. |
|
21 | 31.82% |
| Hellraiser? That some kind of hair removal product? |
|
4 | 6.06% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-27-2012, 06:49 PM
|
#32 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,876
|
Honestly, remove the bad press about Revelations being filmed over a couple of weeks and the fact that Doug Bradley wasn't involved because of the rushed sched and the film actually holds up okay. In terms of structure it is probably the closest film in the entire series to the original, and the focus is thankfully much more geared towards the cenobites. The effects were quite good too, all things considered. I liked it more than anything post Bloodline, barring that nice twist in Hellseeker. It's a shame Bradley wasn't involved because that's the main thing holding the movie back.
__________________
"It's a good scream...it's a good scream..." |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode