![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Maniac
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
With close to 1500 Blu-Ray's in my collection and being 6 years into the format, I have a fair idea what, How and why digital tinkering can make or break a HD transfer. Shout (Scream) Factory apply DNR to their transfers, Olive Films do not....This is fact. Deal with it!!! If you're happy with the way they look, Good for you!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Maniac
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 997
|
Awww....ain't he cute?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Maniac
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 691
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Victim
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pflugerville TX
Posts: 59
|
I've seen my copy of The Nest twice since tuesday and have only watched Ticks once since I got it. 80's over 90's always for me because Im old and it's the nostalgia factor. Also I'd love to have BUG(75) on bluray.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | ||
|
HackMaster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,201
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Stalker
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 183
|
Well hopefully I made the right decision. I went ahead and bought Ticks. Luckily I still have some GiftCard money so I will pick up The Nest next time I see it. I would have picked it up yesterday, but it was sold out.
I'll let you all know what I think when I get a chance to watch it later this week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Maniac
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 588
|
I can probably count on one hand how many horror flicks from the 90's I actually enjoyed. It's by far my least favorite decade for horror (although the present is giving that time period a run for its money) I guess a lot of tastes depends on when you grew up. I was a child of the 80's so a lot of those movies are pure nostalgia to me. I love The Nest, but to be fair, I have yet to see Ticks. Have to check it out at some point.
__________________
mikey-horror.dvdaf.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Stalker
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 471
|
Skeeter... lol jk... This should have had a poll. Never seen The Nest, Love Ticks though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Maniac
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 983
|
I watched these 2 back-to-back last night in honor of this thread. I prefer Ticks--mostly because it knows what it is. It's a fun, goofy B movie that never aspires to anything more. The Nest takes itself a little too seriously at times--and it spends too much time trying to ape Jaws. It only serves to remind you of what an inferior rip-off it is.
The character backstories in both films are dull and ridiculously hackneyed. But Ticks spends a lot less time on those elements than The Nest. For a while The Nest seems like Melrose place with its love triangle and broken family plotlines. Ticks gets to the bug mayhem quickly and keeps the action coming. Supporting performances are mostly terrible in both films--with Clint Howard and Terri Treas doing some of the worst work I've ever seen. Treas stands out more because of the semi-serious tone of The Nest. She's so inept that I'm surprised she ever worked again. Neither film is boring or among the worst the genre has to offer. But I'd much rather re-visit Ticks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|