Horror Digital Forum  

Go Back   Horror Digital Forum > All Things Horror > General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2011, 01:06 AM   #1
Shawn Francis
Maniac
 
Shawn Francis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 692
Thumbs down The REAL Reason AT THE MOUNTAINS OF MADNESS Was Shut Down!

SyFy: In an unusually candid interview, director Guillermo del Toro has revealed why his dream adaptation of At the Mountains of Madness fell apart, and what he's doing instead.

Speaking with Deadline, del Toro believes that it was his insistence on making an R-rated film out of H.P. Lovecraft's classic horror novella that ultimately made the project too risky for its studio, Universal Pictures, to bet $150 million on. "It was the subject of multiple conversations all the way through December," explained del Toro about the studio's attempt to get him to change the movie to PG-13. "The definitive answer was known in December after a big meeting, when we were given the new parameters of budget and rewrites. We proceeded over the next few months to hit those parameters."

Del Toro insisted that all the other requirements for the film, including sticking to the $150 million budget, delivering an impressive visual presentation to the studio and getting Tom Cruise to star, were in place or nearly so. "Closing Tom's deal was in their hands," said del Toro. "He was without a doubt, absolutely in favor of being in the movie. We met extensively, both in Canada and the U.S., dozens of times. Final polishes of the screenplay met with his approval. Closing the deal is not something that was in my hands. They needed to close it corporately."

The problem for Universal, it seems, was that even with Cruise locked in and James Cameron on board as a producer for the 3D production, the bean counters determined that the movie would need to make at least $500 million to earn back its money—something possibly out of reach if teenagers could not get into the theater. "As far as the movie grossing that much, obviously I'm not impartial, but I have to believe that with 3D, Tom Cruise, Jim Cameron, the scope of Lovecraft's novel that is one his best regarded and most widely known works, I would venture that it could absolutely have been done," said del Toro. "I think the R should be worn like a badge of merit in promoting the movie. To say, this is not a gory movie, not a movie full of profanity or violence, but it's a really intense movie."

Del Toro hopes that Universal will let him and Cameron take the project to another studio, but in the meantime he is confirmed to direct Pacific Rim, a sci-fi epic set in a future where the nations of Earth must battle a malevolent invasion. Filming for that will tentatively begin in September. As for the chances of getting At the Mountains of Madness or any potentially risky film off the ground in the future, del Toro said this about the movie industry: "What is really dramatic to me is that most decisions are now being taken by comps, and charts, and target quadrants. All these marketing things we inherited from a completely different system, in the 80s, it has taken hold of the entire industry. Marketers and accountants seem to be running things and less and less of the decisions are in the hands of filmmakers."
__________________
DVD NEWS FLASH
FACEBOOK PAGE
Shawn Francis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 01:13 AM   #2
Harry Warden
HackMaster
 
Harry Warden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hermitage, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,277
I hope Del Toro will get an opportunity to take this to another studio..and give it a proper R release, instead of another PG-13 shitfest.
Harry Warden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 02:33 AM   #3
zombiecraig
Stalker
 
zombiecraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 163
They can shove the fucking 3D up their asses, too.
zombiecraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 02:47 AM   #4
Mikey Horror
Maniac
 
Mikey Horror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 577
Let's face it, making movies is a business investment. The goal is to spend the least to make the most, that's the nature of the beast. The majority of the movie going public these days are teenagers, that's just the way it is. I hate the fact that R rated movies are becoming fewer and further between as time goes on but to be honest, I was done with movie theaters a long, long time ago. Yes, I know that makes me part of the problem not going out to the theater to support the very kinds of movies that I complain about them not making anymore, but I'll be damned if I'm going to spend close to $30 to TRY to watch a movie with assholes talking and not realizing that their cell phones have a vibrate feature and theater management not doing a damn thing to dissuade this type of behavior not to mention the speed at which said movies are hitting the store shelves these days, it just makes more sense for me to wait so I can enjoy it fully at home. I'll keep that $30 a little longer and support the movies I want to see by purchasing the movie when it's released. I would go so far as to say that I really don't think movie theaters will be around in 10-15 years. With the evolution of home theater technology, I wouldn't be suprised to see your television become to movies what your iPod is to your music.
__________________
mikey-horror.dvdaf.com

Last edited by Mikey Horror; 03-10-2011 at 02:55 AM.
Mikey Horror is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 03:51 AM   #5
Ptflea2
Maniac
 
Ptflea2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 749
Yeah, it's real easy for a director to tell a group of board members and producers his movie will make 500+ million when it's not your money. Oh, and the last movie that combined James Cameron and 3D -that cave movie- just died at the box office.

Last edited by Ptflea2; 03-10-2011 at 03:54 AM.
Ptflea2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 05:58 AM   #6
KamuiX
The Eighth Samurai
 
KamuiX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,948
Here's an idea: how about shoot it, oh, I don't know, in 2D? Maybe that might cut the costs a bit? Not really worried about whether it looks like Cthulhu's tentacles are coming towards me or not...
__________________

Please visit my site...It's the future!


Wii Friend Code: 8897-8584-2714-5768 // XBL & PS3 GamerTag: KamuiXZero
KamuiX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 06:30 AM   #7
bigdaddyhorse
Detroit Hi-on
 
bigdaddyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 11,931
3D and PG-13, all fucking evil, stupid and way too popular. The 3D fad has to be dying, right?
__________________
"!"

My Fucking DVDS
bigdaddyhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 07:06 AM   #8
Erick H.
HackMaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,432
When I was a young teen I RESENTED PG-13 movies,I always felt like they were trying to keep me from getting to the ''good stuff ". If there was an "R'' movie out that I wasn't able to buy a ticket for I'd find a way to see it somehow.Either get someone older to buy me a ticket,go to a theater where I knew they were too uninvolved to check my age for an "R'' ticket or buy a ticket for something else and just go to the popcorn counter,buy a bag and walk into the movie I wanted,right past the ushers.I don't recall EVER getting caught.Is it really that much harder to get a pre 18yr. old into an "R'' rated movie now ? I'm truly curious,how many of you younger guys on the board have ever been stopped by the management from seeing an "R'' rated movie ?

I respect del Toro for holding out for the "R'' and not compromising his vision.You CAN make a good PG-13 horror flick IF the material is fitting of that rating but watering down an "R'' rated concept in order to snag a PG-13 frequently leads to a pretty thin movie.There's too much wishy washy horror coming out lately.
Erick H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 07:33 AM   #9
Marshall Crist
Stalker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 286
Jesus Christ, Tom Cruise was attached to this? How about $20 million, unrated, and an all-stripper cast?
Marshall Crist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 03:51 PM   #10
bigdaddyhorse
Detroit Hi-on
 
bigdaddyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 11,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick H. View Post
Is it really that much harder to get a pre 18yr. old into an "R'' rated movie now ? I'm truly curious,how many of you younger guys on the board have ever been stopped by the management from seeing an "R'' rated movie ?
It's probably easier today than when I was a teen in the late 80's. Back then, people cared about their job, so you had to be slick and avoid being seen at all, any person working there would be a threat to our schemes. Then you had to keep low and act cool in the theater when the ushers came by. I haven't seen an usher in like 15 years now!

Plus today, no one young cares about shit but themselves, and really don't give a fuck about their jobs. So instead of having to avoid everyone, just avoid managers or owners. As for it being easy to buy a ticket for show a and go to b or c, too easy. 90% of the time me and the lady go to the movies, we pay for one then walk into a second on the way out, which is comparable to sneaking in the wrong one. I still look shady too, not like I'm some clean cut suit and tie guy you wouldn't raise any suspision.

The multi-plex makes it so simple. I wish we had that shit when I was a kid, could've seen many more classics on the big screen. Much harder to do when the theater has 4 screens instead of 20!

Of course none of this helps the filmmakers of the R movie as the PG-13 will get the box office. Unless they put sensors in the seats and counted who was watching what, the movie you buy the ticket for gets the box office credit. I know I helped more a few stupid PG films become blockbusters when I was younger, and probably still haven't seen some of them!
__________________
"!"

My Fucking DVDS

Last edited by bigdaddyhorse; 03-10-2011 at 03:55 PM.
bigdaddyhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 05:45 PM   #11
Kolpitz
Purely and Simply Evil
 
Kolpitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boxborough, MA
Posts: 1,503
Del Toro has actually said that he thinks that the film would get a PG-13, as there is no blood, gore, profanity or nudity. He just thinks that it'll be too intense for a PG-13. He sites the remake of Don't Be Afraid of the Dark that he produced, where everyone involved was sure they would get a PG-13 but the MPAA slapped it with an R, saying it was too intense. This is exactly what happened to Peter Jackson with The Frighteners. They shot the film as a PG-13 but the MPAA said the subject matter was an R. Del Toro doesn't want to commit to a PG-13 and then have the MPAA give the film an R, forcing him, contractually, to edit the film to receive a PG-13.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to one good scare.

My DVD Collection

Everybody's Doing It

Be a Follower

The Films I've Watched: 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
Kolpitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 06:01 PM   #12
cjg
Maniac
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: iowa
Posts: 758
Fuck Tom Cruise And Fuck 3D
cjg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 06:02 PM   #13
bigdaddyhorse
Detroit Hi-on
 
bigdaddyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 11,931
The MPAA never makes sense anyway.
Frighteners gets an R with not a single cuss word, drop of blood or hint of sex.

W. gets PG-13, but says Fuck twice (I thought 1 was all you got).
I was watching somethign else PG-13 the other day and someone told someone else "to fuck themselves", also an instan R from teh last thing I had read.

So they definitly play favorites and the rules change from film to film. I can't belive so many still put stock in them, esp. after all their bullshit hypocrisy and shit has been made public. Last check, not one memebr had a child under 15! These are old fucking stiff suits pushing their outdated views on everyone, comparable to the crusades and Hitler! Fuck em all, burn it!
__________________
"!"

My Fucking DVDS
bigdaddyhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 06:07 PM   #14
hellraiser40
Maniac
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 704
i don't see why such a movie should cost 150 million dollars? if they cut the 3D and keep the 'monsters' to a required minimum (as in 'using it for maximal shock effect' instead of making it a 'monster movie') they should be able to do it for less

i don't mind Tom Cruise, but why not a real character actor in the main part?

i think that eventually this will resurface, it will only take a little more time
hellraiser40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2011, 07:11 PM   #15
MorallySound
There is no magic.
 
MorallySound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdaddyhorse View Post
The MPAA never makes sense anyway.
Frighteners gets an R with not a single cuss word, drop of blood or hint of sex.

W. gets PG-13, but says Fuck twice (I thought 1 was all you got).
I was watching somethign else PG-13 the other day and someone told someone else "to fuck themselves", also an instan R from teh last thing I had read.

So they definitly play favorites and the rules change from film to film. I can't belive so many still put stock in them, esp. after all their bullshit hypocrisy and shit has been made public. Last check, not one memebr had a child under 15! These are old fucking stiff suits pushing their outdated views on everyone, comparable to the crusades and Hitler! Fuck em all, burn it!
You can say Fuck twice for PG-13, the third time it's R. Pretty sure this is also confirmed in the excellent doc "This Film is Not Yet Rated".
__________________
"Things only seem to be magic. There is no real magic. There's no real magic ever." - Martin

Bad Monster Films | Mantis in Black Lace | Vimeo | Letterboxd | Tumblr | Twitter | Reel to Reel | Oh, the Horror! | DVD Aficionado
MorallySound is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1999-2012 Horrordvds.com

No text or images from this site may be reprinted or used elsewhere without express consent from Horrordvds.com