Horror Digital Forum  

Go Back   Horror Digital Forum > The Niche's Corner > High Definition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2011, 10:26 PM   #16
Horrorphilly
Maniac
 
Horrorphilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 865
If they are indeed the cover art for the BD's.They get greatest art work of 2011.Ive always loved that art for H2.


Sean
Horrorphilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 10:56 PM   #17
blackeye
Screamy Bopper
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
Someone on the forums made those covers as a placeholder until the real covers are revealed.
blackeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 11:51 PM   #18
SaxCatz
Maniac
 
SaxCatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Dry Dry Desert, AZ
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt89 View Post
I always find it odd that studios change the artwork for films, even if it is to make the film appear more "modern". You don't see record labels changing album artwork to "modernize" them (because album artwork can look JUST as dated). Music can age just as much as a film can so the idea of making it appear more contemporary seems ridiculous because it's the same film underneath it all...

It would be considered blasphemy to change the artwork for an album like Jackson's Thriller or Springsteen's Born in the U.S.A. (even though the cover of Thriller looks dated) so I don't understand why it's okay to fuck around with iconic artwork for a film. It's just strange, when you think about it, how in the music industry a company wouldn't dare fuck with album artwork but when it comes to the film industry, artwork is very often completely changed.

~Matt
I'm note so much really suggesting changing the poster artwork itself. Again, just like with Blue Underground's new Zombie cover, I just suggest updating the backgrounds, borders, etc to accentuate the actual art.
SaxCatz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2011, 11:54 PM   #19
Dobby
i get alot of headaches
 
Dobby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft
Posts: 1,900
If it seems to good to be true it probably is. Those words seem to have a higher meaning nowadays.
Dobby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 01:05 AM   #20
Mitbox
Stalker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chile
Posts: 289
Alright!! Season of the Witch on Blu!!
Hope they treat us with something on those discs.
Mitbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 01:54 AM   #21
dickieduvet
Maniac
 
dickieduvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 689
Quote:
Originally Posted by maybrick View Post
Which DVD? The 30th Anniversary edition of Jaws I have seems fine to me.
Compare it to Roger Kastel's original poster art, It's horrendous...nice triangular Shark now...Shite!
dickieduvet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 02:36 AM   #22
Zombie Dude
HackMaster
 
Zombie Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by dickieduvet View Post
Compare it to Roger Kastel's original poster art, It's horrendous...nice triangular Shark now...Shite!
It looks the same to me.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Zombie Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 03:29 AM   #23
dave13
HackMaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Dude View Post
It looks the same to me.
it's definitely a new drawing. look at the teeth on the shark, the point of its snout, and the positioning of the girl's arm in the water. not to mention the added bubbles which make the shark look slimmer and obscure the girl's breasts. its a new version of the same scene. i wouldn't get upset about it, but i see the differences. and given the choice, i would prefer the original. this seems like an example of what SaxCatz is saying (sorry if i'm putting words in your mouth) about updating cover art. Personally, i'm not a fan. In pretty much any case I can think of, I would want the artwork to reflect the original poster art as closely as possible. Any deviation, no matter how small, I would probably consider detrimental. Even when it comes to the text at the bottom of a poster.



for my money, one of the most disappointing cover art changes of the last few years was for the dvd of Die Hard. Changing the tagline from "40 stories of sheer terror" to "40 stories of sheer adventure" completely neutered the concept. so disappointing.
dave13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 03:36 AM   #24
Zombie Dude
HackMaster
 
Zombie Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave13 View Post
it's definitely a new drawing. look at the teeth on the shark, the point of its snout, and the positioning of the girl's arm in the water. not to mention the added bubbles which make the shark look slimmer and obscure the girl's breasts. its a new version of the same scene. i wouldn't get upset about it, but i see the differences. and given the choice, i would prefer the original. this seems like an example of what SaxCatz is saying (sorry if i'm putting words in your mouth) about updating cover art. Personally, i'm not a fan. In pretty much any case I can think of, I would want the artwork to reflect the original poster art as closely as possible. Any deviation, no matter how small, I would probably consider detrimental. Even when it comes to the text at the bottom of a poster.



for my money, one of the most disappointing cover art changes of the last few years was for the dvd of Die Hard. Changing the tagline from "40 stories of sheer terror" to "40 stories of sheer adventure" completely neutered the concept. so disappointing.
Well essentially they are still the same. I wouldn't have noticed unless I saw the images side by side. I don't think it's terrible but the original art is better.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Zombie Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 04:39 AM   #25
buck135
HackMaster
 
buck135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 1,834
I wonder if the artists require additional compensation in order to allow the studios to use the original posters for DVD's/Blu-rays. I can't imagine why else they would alter/replace the covers.
__________________
"Do you read Sutter Cane?"
buck135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 04:32 PM   #26
wago70
Robinson Crusoe on Mars
 
wago70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco - down by them two ol' sheds
Posts: 2,978
I wonder if re-doing artwork for older releases are done by interns or something being given little jobs to do so they learn the trade.
Most re-dos look really cheap and not very professional.
wago70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 05:51 PM   #27
bigdaddyhorse
Detroit Hi-on
 
bigdaddyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 11,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by buck135 View Post
I wonder if the artists require additional compensation in order to allow the studios to use the original posters for DVD's/Blu-rays. I can't imagine why else they would alter/replace the covers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wago70 View Post
I wonder if re-doing artwork for older releases are done by interns or something being given little jobs to do so they learn the trade.
Most re-dos look really cheap and not very professional.

I think both of these are somewhat on the mark, although I'm not sure how publishing artwork works. I used to think you'd pay the artist to paint, then the painting was yours as you paid for it. But now at least some are probably leased for a time period.

Then when they don't want to ante up again or the suits think "we can make this more compemporary and hip", bring in the interns to put some photoshop crap together.

Even little changes can feel huge. I had to go get the poster art for my Jaws custom cover and didn't even notice how bad the shark looked at the time, just the girl swimming with different arms and no boobs. Looking side by side, her hair is also different and her arms got bigger. It's not even the same girl!
__________________
"!"

My Fucking DVDS

Last edited by bigdaddyhorse; 06-27-2011 at 05:56 PM.
bigdaddyhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2011, 09:25 PM   #28
ronnie21
HackMaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,096
i really can't see them using the original artwork for both halloweens.. but i hope 2 looks better than the last dvd version...
ronnie21 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 03:28 AM   #29
DVDBone
Stalker
 
DVDBone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 175
Universal officially announced Halloween II on BD today with a street date of 9/13. The cover isn't the original art but rather a close-up of Michael Myers' face (pretty disappointing). But the great news is that there are some great extra features ...

BONUS MATERIALS :
• Alternate Ending
• Deleted Scenes
• Terror In the Aisles Documentary
• BD-Live
• My Scenes
• Pocket BLU App

Retail is only $19.99 as well so this sounds like a good upgrade! No official news on Season of the Witch yet ...
DVDBone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2011, 03:34 AM   #30
rxfiend
Joe Six-Pack
 
rxfiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southern IN
Posts: 4,054
Holy shit, a Halloween 2 release with extras!! Come on Universal, give Halloween 3 the same treatment (a commentary with Tom Atkins would RULE!!!!!!!!).
__________________
My web domain * Night Screams BLOG
rxfiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
amazing grace, myers shoulder massage

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1999-2012 Horrordvds.com

No text or images from this site may be reprinted or used elsewhere without express consent from Horrordvds.com