Horror Digital Forum  

Go Back   Horror Digital Forum > The Niche's Corner > High Definition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2012, 07:31 AM   #16
dave13
HackMaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by X-human View Post
I'm a little apprehensive about these upcoming transfers as Buck Privates is turning out to be over processed. Considering how Jurassic Park ended up there's not much guarantee that they'll even do Spielberg's babies right.

I'm mostly worried about the Classic Monsters and Hitchcock though. If any of these releases are fucked up there's little chance they'll revisit them any time soon.
whats the story on buck privates and jurassic park?
dave13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 01:48 PM   #17
jscott
Guided By Voices
 
jscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 787
Never understood the hubub about Jaws on DVD, but I didn't see the film until 2000/01, when I got a used copy of the Signature Collection Laserdisc set. After watching the video, I may get the blu, but its not a priority.
__________________
http://www.profondocinema.com
jscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 01:50 PM   #18
X-human
I ate my keys
 
X-human's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,318
Sorry, I meant to link a review for Buck Privates at least. Here's what Robert Harris, who did the restorations on Vertigo and Spartacus in the 90's, had to say:
Quote:
As part of the Universal 100th Anniversary, I was hopeful that we be seeing something that looked like film, as that seems to be the direction in which the studio is heading. And it does look very nice. Clean, with good black and nice shadow detail. But as my friend Jeff Wells over at Hollywood Elsewhere, refers to me, I'm a "grain monk,' and to my eye, Buck Privates has just a bit too much digital magic going on, and I don't believe it was necessary.

One can clean up an image without removing the appearance of cinema. When you view it, keep in mind that it was shot on the same stock as Casablanca, and you'll get the idea.

Image - 3
Audio - 4
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/31...tes-in-blu-ray

So it looks like they did pretty good job restoring the film and then cranked up the DNR. A typical studio fear of old black and white films. At the very least this looks to be what will happen for Abbott and Costello Meets Frankenstein announced for this year too.

Jurassic Park was the same masters originally done for the DVDs so they had Edge Enhancement and lacked finer details. Much like Back to the Future's Blu-ray. It's just laziness on their parts and so I have doubts that they'd pull a 180 this year. Considering the just released DVD boxset re-release of Dracula/Frankenstein/Bride/Creature from last month was the same old transfers all over again (when they already confirmed new transfers are done for Dracula) that's not a confidence builder either.

My only hope is that it's a clue that the rumored 3D release of Creature may infact be on the horizon since they've never paired Creature with these other three together on DVD before; Wolfman is the more obvious choice. It may be a good sign that they're testing the waters on Creature.
__________________
The combined weight of the horrors I have authored wrought would crush your carbon hearts into perfect diamonds of terror!

A Few Ants Short. And what the hell, check out my DVD Collection won't you?
X-human is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 05:31 PM   #19
Matt89
HackMaster
 
Matt89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,001
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-r...es_blu-ray.htm

I'm starting to lose faith in this guy. Sometimes he's insanely off in his reviews. (Does he even watch the discs half the time?) Some reviews are very detailed and some are just incredibly lazy.

~Matt
__________________
"If a man can bridge the gap between life and death ... I mean, if he can live on after his death, then maybe he was a great man."
- James Dean
Matt89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 07:20 PM   #20
dave13
HackMaster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt89 View Post
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-r...es_blu-ray.htm

I'm starting to lose faith in this guy. Sometimes he's insanely off in his reviews. (Does he even watch the discs half the time?) Some reviews are very detailed and some are just incredibly lazy.

~Matt
yeah, those screen captures look pretty sharp at first glance, but there's no grain evident at all! as far as some of the Beaver reviews go, I'm spending less and less time reading what is written, and just focusing on the screen captures. sometimes his writing is well put together, and other times its riddled with grammatical errors and really immature writing style. It honestly feels like they're being written by two different people, although the name at the top is the same...

also disappointed that universal isn't ponying up for any new supplements for these. i don't care too much about those "100 years..." featurettes. even a half-hour retrospective on the film itself would be a nice addition. the digibooks with all their artwork and text are nice, but not worth the crazy prices being charged ($30+ as far as i've seen - its whats kept me from picking up All Quiet on the Western Front).

its disappointing to hear about the Jurassic Park discs as well. I'd kind of been planning on picking the set up when I found one for a decent price. Now, maybe not...

Last edited by dave13; 04-11-2012 at 07:23 PM.
dave13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 11:03 PM   #21
Jeremy
Closet SCREAM fan
 
Jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 844
It would be interesting to compile a list of Universal's catalog Blu-Ray titles, alongside the names of the people who produced and worked on each release, which may be listed either in the booklet that comes with the disc or somewhere in the menus of the disc itself. The reason it would be interesting is that Universal's catalog Blus seem to be hit or miss. Quite a lot of them show evidence of DNR, but some much more than others. I suspect that Universal probably doesn't have a consistent policy on how to deal with this issue, leaving it up to the individual disc producers to make their own judgement calls.
Jeremy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2012, 03:13 AM   #22
Jaws
Screamy Bopper
 
Jaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3
The transfer so far looks fucking amazing. Can't wait to finally see TSISW after seeing it a few years ago at a screening.
Jaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1999-2012 Horrordvds.com

No text or images from this site may be reprinted or used elsewhere without express consent from Horrordvds.com