Horror Digital  

Go Back   Horror Digital > Reviews > Hi-Def Reviews

Latest Poll
What's your favorite Christopher Lee Horror Performance?
Count Dracula
Dacula AD 1972
Dracula Has Risen From the Grave
Dracula: Prince of Darkness
Horror Express
Horror Hotel
Horror of Dracula
Howling II
Rasputin the Mad Monk
Scars of Dracula
Scream and Scream Again
Taste the Blood of Dracula
The Curse of Frankenstein
The Devil Rides Out
The Gorgon
The House That Dripped Blood
The Mummy
The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
The Wicker Man
Other (specify in thread)
Who's Online
There are currently 0 members and 39 guests. Most users ever online was 2,642, 04-12-2015 at 05:18 PM.
 Thread Rating: 43 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 11-28-2008, 09:53 PM
Scored: 7
Views: 17,593
Stendhal Syndrome, The

Reviewer: Rhett
Review Date: November 28, 2008

Released by: Anchor Bay
Release date: 11/18/2008
MSRP: $29.95
Format: Blu-ray
Region A, NTSC
VC1, 1080p
Widescreen 1.66:1 | 16x9: Yes

inline ImageWith moneymaker The Final Countdown out of the way, now Blue Underground can really focus on upgrading their catalogue to high definition. Their first horror title is a big one, Dario Argento's nineties classic, The Stendhal Syndrome. Probably the last mature film the maestro ever made before descending into written for hire boobs and blood odysseys, Stendhal is backed by a brutal and effective mediation on femininity to give all the sex and gore substance. It's a great film, and a fine way for Argento to make his fist splash on Blu-ray. The question now, though, is whether or not it's worth the upgrade for all those that sprung for Blue Underground's quality two disc DVD last year. Full HD 1080, 7.1 DTS-HD, 7.1 Dolby True HD...it's got all the buzzwords, but does it deliver?

The Story

inline ImageAnna Manni (Asia Argento) walks through a crowded art museum, where beautiful sculptures and paintings from Rembrandt, Michelangelo and Caravaggio fill the scenery. So beautiful, and so powerful in their message, they overwhelm Anna. She sees into them, their vision more lucid than even reality. She gets dizzy. It’s overpowering. She faints. That’s the Stendhal Syndrome, a case of a viewer of art so overwhelmed by the imagery that s/he is unable to retain consciousness. Anna has a lot more going on in her mind too, though. She’s a policewoman working for a rape squad, and she’s been tipped that Rome’s most notorious rapist and serial killer is inside the museum as well. Sure enough, he is, and shortly after she comes to, she’s viciously raped by the man she was stalking.

inline ImageAlfredo (Thomas Kretschmann) looks like a good person, indeed he was confused for one when he returned Anna’s purse to her after she fainted. Lurking behind that slick blonde hair and confident smile is a misogynist bent on dominating women to contribute to his own narcissism. He often talks nice to his victims, courts them, and then rapes them, tying them up and then after he is finished, putting a bullet through each side of their cheeks. He demeans his victims, sucking the life out of them much like the paintings do to Anna. She’s a confident woman, but the rape scars her, leaving her wanting vengeance, and worse, to fill the dead spots he left inside her.

inline ImageAnna cuts off all her hair, to which her brother remarks she looks like a boy, and sets out to trap Alfredo once and for all. In the pursuit though, she slowly starts to morph into what she is hunting. She sees a psychiatrist and tries to use painting as catharsis for the issues she is dealing with, but she ends up only painting the pain that Alfredo inflicts. She never wants to be dominated like that again, but killing him won’t be enough. If she can be him, no man will ever violate her like that again, right?

“Physical pain doesn’t bother me…it makes me feel alive.”

inline ImageAnna says this in the film, but it may as well bare Dario’s name beside it. The Stendhal Syndrome is a fascinating catharsis for a man who has reveled in violence in his art for his entire career. Argento has never used violence for mere entertainment, he’s always played with it like a child a dead bird, flipping it over to see the death that we all subconsciously fear. He stylizes it, slows it down and examines every facet of pain, hoping that in his images he can find art, something that will lessen our collective fears of death. The fatal car crash slowed down and played five times over in Four Flies on Grey Velvet was a start, and Opera’s slow motion head wound (where the bullet ricochets later through a telephone in the room) shows Argento forever holding violence under a microscope to truly discover its power. Here he takes violence to its stylized limits, literally making it microscopic with CG shots of bullets going through the flesh or pills dropping down a throat. Physical pain doesn’t bother Argento, no, it is the psychology that drives him mad.

inline ImageWith The Stendhal Syndrome, Argento shows that art can exhibit great power both for its maker and its audience. These are themes he’s touched on before, like with Tenebre and Opera, questioning the role of the artist and his responsibilities when showing violence to the public. Here though, he internalizes it. This is about what art can do to the individual, not the society as a whole. He gets into the psychology of Anna, with her bouts with the shrink and even moreso with her artistic hallucinations. When in one dream she is raped by a portrait with a huge phallus, we as a viewer are reminded what true psychological horror is, and it is not the childish moral games of the Saw franchise. To her art is overwhelming, but her painting, both on the paper and at one point even her body, help her deal with the demons that haunt her mind. They don’t help her much, mind you, but still, it’s progress.

inline ImageArgento shows great progress himself with The Stendhal Syndrome too, expanding his theories on violence in the movies to much grander statements about art and psychology as a whole. It’s not the pain of the flesh that’s the problem, it’s the demons it can instill in the mind thereafter. He offers a compassionate, sad and often brutal character portrait, severing most ties to the conventional giallo format he made and preached, this time truly devoted to character rather than plot. When the main killer stops being a plot device an hour in, Argento proves that he’s not just about making gialli, but instead about exploring the impact violence can have on its victims.

inline ImageAnna’s harrowing change from being the victim to the victimizer is done with amazing skill, illustrated by Argento through various skillful pieces of mise en scene. Paintings are rife with thousands of motifs and symbols, and so too is The Stendhal Syndrome, his most academic film. Her name hints at her transformation, Anna Manni, and so too does her later courting of a Frenchman with the very feminine designation of Marie. The obvious signs are there too, she first cuts her hair to a boy’s length, and then later wears a blonde wig to match the hair color of her culprit’s.

inline ImageSince this is a film about art though, how threatening, powerful and cathartic it can be, the metaphor that resonates most is a snow globe of Michelangelo’s David. The camera lingers longer than usual on it at seemingly random points in the movie, and slowly Anna begins to fixate her gaze on it as well. There it is, the ultimate figure of man in full exposure, both proud and nakedly vulnerable, and in it Anna can see herself what she wants to be and also the fragile specimen she currently is. The flakes that cover his body when the globe is shook, symbolize the chaos in her own life, but also speak broadly about art in general. That image returns Argento to his roots, with David becoming a literal abstraction, just like the elusive grainy photo in Antonioni’s Blowup that inspired Argento for his very first film. The abstraction of art shows to us the power of the mind, how we fill in gaps and make associations to better help us understand our existence. Anna wants clarity in life and in art, but everywhere is abstraction. That is the film’s greatest tragedy.

Image Quality

inline Imageinline Image
Blue Underground DVD

Okay, the reason you're all here. The Stendhal Syndrome lived a crowded life on DVD, with a number of releases from all over the globe. Hell, even Troma released it at one point. The Blue Underground upgrade had the best colors, and while it may not have looked the most organic, it was also a tad sharper than the previous Medusa R2 benchmark. Well, those colors are back in this VC1 1080p transfer, and they look even more vibrant with the added color space of HD. Argento really piles on the red in this film, whether it be CGI shots of bullets flying through blood cells or temptresses in red dresses, and there's no doubt more detail within those previously hard to capture colors. The aspect ratio is 1.66:1, but like the DVD this has thankfully been anamorphically enhanced. The main video file gets a comfy 36 GB of space devoted to it, so compression shouldn't be a problem...but something isn't quite right.

inline Image inline Image
Blue Underground DVD

I noted in my previous review of the DVD that the sharpness at times looked artificial, and that's confirmed here with the added resolution. Like the problematic Black Christmas Blu-ray, this disc is ridden with ultra fine digital noise. The lesser resolution of DVD was able to soften it, but here it really sticks out. There are dancing dots everywhere. It doesn't at all resemble film grain, so it looks like someone went correction heavy in the intermediate process. It is a shame, because it's that one flaw that really hampers this disc, removing the usual depth these HD transfers often contain, and overshadowing what's otherwise a crisp, colorful and visually striking film. Considering what a visual stylist Argento is, I had high hopes for this transfer, but the noise here is a real damper. I guess we'll have to wait for his earlier classics to really bask in imagery.


Well, if the video was a disappointment, at least the audio here is spot on. In either 7.1 DTS-HD or Dolby True HD, this track sounds excellent. Even more than the solid DVD track, this really gives a sense of envelopment and executes some really effective surround moments. The most notable is when Anna is popping back pills and Argento cuts to CGI shots of them going down into her stomach. The inner rumblings resonate from all speakers and I felt for a second that I was hallucinating Innerspace. While other scenes don't utilize the surrounds as well as they should, like the painting where old quakers mumble before she covers it up, it's always a rich and deep track. There is plenty of left to right movement and a full sounding LFE channel. It's too bad the Italian track (also included here in Dolby Digital 5.1 EX) wasn't given all the bells and whistles, but even still it sounds great as an alternative. Overall though, ths mixes here are seriously solid and probably the first I've heard where the upgrade over DVD sound is fully noticeable.

Supplemental Material

This Blu-ray ports everything from the two disc DVD release, right down to the theatrical trailer. Before I delve into just what's on the disc, I'll quickly comment on the menu system. While not as thematic and effective as the pop-up menu from The Final Countdown, the razor blade navigation box is certainly a nice touch. It's pretty straightforward, though, and a bit awkward to control at times, since sometimes getting back to the razor is done with an "up" while others it is with a "left". The menu is a little generic, and nowhere is the title to be found. the other gripe is that there is no pop-up menu for the supplements. That's a bit of a pain. But enough with that, let's get to the quality extras.

inline ImageThe back of the DVD box advertised that this as the first time the film has been completely uncut and uncensored, and while I don’t have all the other versions to corroborate, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. So that makes this Blu-ray, then, the second time this has been completely uncut! What they are probably talking about, though, are the two short, subtitled dialogue scenes that are included (like Deep Red-lite). One is pretty disposable, but the other is a pretty harrowing scene of a man crying about his daughter’s death, asking if Anna could tell her what his daughter was feeling before she died. A big emotional scene isn’t really what horror fans clamor for when the word “uncut” is written, but truth be told, this is one of the better lost additions to a film I’ve seen in a long while. Before that point, there’s that hint of possible Argento misogyny, especially after a woman tries to lure a man into a junk yard to have sex “where the whores do”, but this little scene demonstrates the compassion Argento holds for his characters and situations.

As for extras, there are five featurettes done by the dependable David Gregory. The first and best is with Argento, and it runs 22-minutes. He talks about how his stint in America was a waste of time, and how Stendhal was a breath of fresh air. He researched it plenty, and talks about the syndrome and how it has effected him personally (at the Parthenon, no less!). He then concludes saying it is a favorite of his films. Next up is an interview with Graziella Magherini, whose writing on the titular syndrome was what drove Argento to make the film. She also served as a creative consultant as well, but spends her time in this 22-minute featurette talking about her studies on the syndrome, stating various cases and the effects it has had on people. It’s a little dry, and bordering on Amityville-unbelievable, but still a good watch.

inline ImageThe last three featurettes, all running between 16-22 minutes, are with other members of the production team. Special Effects man Sergio Stivaletti talks about making the jump to digital effects after serving as Argento’s traditional effects guy ever since Phenomena. He details the process of the bullet shot quite well, with some nice supporting footage, and surprises when he says that it was actually an influence to the effects team behind The Matrix. Production Designer Massimo Antonello Geleng, who worked on several pictures for Fellini, describes the art of scenery, and shares some nice observations on Argento, cinematographer Guiseppe Rotunno and on his interpretations of the looks of several scenes. He’s a smart guy, and this is a lot more involving and entertaining than it would first seem. The last is with Assistant Director Luigi Cozzi, and is surprisingly the best of the bunch.

inline ImageCozzi talks about how he started as a journalist and was the first to interview Argento as a director. This led to him writing Four Flies on Grey Velvet and to collaborating with Dario on several other fronts, like special effects and assistant directing. He even had a distinguished stint as a giallo director, too. The real goods though, are Cozzi detailing Argento’s involvement with The Five Days of Milan and more importantly the ever pertinent rights issue over Four Flies. He finally comes clean about the problem, and it is a must see for any Argento fan. He talks about a horror emporium he and Dario made that still exists to this day in Italy. There are so many other fascinating tidbits to come from Cozzi, he needs to write a book. The Blu-ray is rounded off with the trailer.

Final Thoughts

inline ImageThe Stendhal Syndrome delivers the controversial carnage we expect from Argento, but the surprising maturity of the subject matter and the depth of character may win the film more fans than usual for Argento's works. High brow or low brow, Argento will shoot your brow right off with this effective work. There's no question it deserves to be seen, but whether that's on Blu-ray or DVD is a bit less obvious. The Blu-ray exhibits a beautiful soundtrack that's even fuller than the DVD and no doubt the best I've heard on the format thus far. The image, though, is a disappointment, since it is ridden with noise from what looks like digital sharpening. The Blu-ray is no doubt sharper and more colorful, but the softness of DVD makes for a more flattering representation of the film. The extras are the same across both releases, and are well worth checking out regardless. If you can get the Blu-ray cheap, go for it, but otherwise the DVD will stand up just fine. Now please, Mr. Lustig, tell us when Suspiria is coming.


Movie - A

Image Quality - B*

Sound - A

Supplements - B+

*Because of the quality of the HD format, the clarity, resolution and color depth are inherently a major leap over DVD. Since any Blu-ray will naturally have better characteristics than DVDs, the rating is therefore only in comparison with other Blu-ray titles, rather than home video in general. So while a Blu-ray film may only get a C, it will likely be much better than a DVD with an A.

Technical Info.
  • Color
  • Running time - 1 hour 59 minutes
  • Not Rated
  • 1 Disc
  • English DTS-HD 7.1
  • English Dolby True HD 7.1
  • English Dolby Digital Surround EX 5.1
  • Italian 5.1 Dolby Digital Surround EX 5.1
  • English subtitles

  • Theatrical trailer
  • Interviews with Dario Argento, Psychologist Graziella Magherini, Special Effects man Sergio Stivaletti, AD Luigi Cozzi, and Production Designer Massimo Antonello Geleng

Other Pictures


Can't argue with a confident man.

New Article
New Reply

Hi-Def Reviews
« Previous | Next »

Old 11-28-2008, 11:32 PM
They stay the same age...
Damn, and this was the Blu-ray I was most excited to pick up since I don't own any version of the film yet. I was actually just going to ask you if you'd seen this last night because I was going to get it from Amazon if you had and gave it the nod. Guess I'll have to settle with Zombie Strippers and Interview with the Vampire as my first horror Blus.

I'll have to take a little time to figure out which is really right for me.
Oh, the Horror! Reviews - Theatrical, DVD and VHS horror reviews, interviews and lists! Now on Twitter!
B.A.L.L.S. Academy - Your Alma mater for teen films, raunchy, low-brow comedies, sexploitation & coming of age dramas.
Old 11-28-2008, 11:53 PM
Interview with the Vampire isn't as good on Blu Ray as it is on DVD. For some reason they dropped the DTS track, and you are left with just a 5.1 track. The picture isn't that much of an improvement either so... yes, there are quite a few cases where they really dropped the ball on Blu Ray.
"First you wanna kill me, now you wanna kiss me. Blow."

My Movie Collection

The Horror and More! Podcast
Old 11-29-2008, 02:49 AM
it looks like film grain to me, i think it's a good transfer, it looks like they didnt tinker with it actually
Old 12-01-2008, 05:17 PM
didn't look like grain or anything just lots of spots everywhere

guess I willl stick with the medusa DVD for repeat viewing
Old 12-07-2008, 04:04 AM
I don't like that kind of grain (if that is it). I have seen Young Frankenstein (which is B&W and "heavy grained" too) and I don't like the result. Maybe it's good thing for projectors and not for LCD Displays this "grainy" video transfers.
If you get more 1080p captures and look at them in a proper 1920x1080 display you'll see the video transfer is not very good. At least I don't like what I'm looking at on my 16:9 1080p LCD display.

Check: stendhal14.jpg from here:

All we have to do is wait for some real brand new transfer from the negatives and we'll be dumping this release.
Old 12-23-2008, 04:54 AM
Horny Spirit
Quite honestly, that has to be the worst transfer I've ever seen. Thankfully I stuck with the DVD version. For good representation of film grain, check out something like MAGNUM FORCE or THE WILD BUNCH. This reminds me of watching something on my Grandmother's TV set back in 1975. It wasn't grain, it was just noise.
My Collection

Old 02-18-2009, 03:50 PM
Johnny Hallyday forever
It is not film grain. It is digital noise. There is noise even in the whitest of whites. That's why.
Unless Stendhal was filmed on 16mm.
Well... I don't think so.

Fuck'em. I'll wait for the Italian DVD. As we all know, Italians do it better.
"Only on Horrordvds.com could a well intentioned get well thread turn into an infomercial about the propensity for testicular perspiration".
Old 10-10-2009, 11:34 PM
The DVDTalk review calls the 2 disc release a "thing of beauty" and raves about the image. http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/30422...e-the/?___rd=1 Is there a general consensus these past few months of Blu being a noticeable improvement?

Last edited by youthief; 10-10-2009 at 11:38 PM..
Old 10-12-2009, 03:53 PM
With its limited resolution, the DVD certainly does look like a thing of beauty. Once it is blown up to Blu-ray, though, all the digital noise enhancements are clearly visible. It looks like there is a thick screen placed in front of the Blu-ray image at all times. By all means the DVD is a more satisfying viewing experience, as weird as it sounds.
Can't argue with a confident man.

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Main > Reviews > Hi-Def Reviews
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Portal By vbPortal Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vbPortal. All Rights Reserved.