Horror Digital  

Go Back   Horror Digital > Reviews > DVD Reviews N-Z

Latest Poll
What's your favorite Christopher Lee Horror Performance?
Count Dracula
Dacula AD 1972
Dracula Has Risen From the Grave
Dracula: Prince of Darkness
Horror Express
Horror Hotel
Horror of Dracula
Howling II
Rasputin the Mad Monk
Scars of Dracula
Scream and Scream Again
Taste the Blood of Dracula
The Curse of Frankenstein
The Devil Rides Out
The Gorgon
The House That Dripped Blood
The Mummy
The Two Faces of Dr. Jekyll
The Wicker Man
Other (specify in thread)
Who's Online
There are currently 0 members and 60 guests. Most users ever online was 2,642, 04-12-2015 at 05:18 PM.
 Thread Rating: 60 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 02-20-2012, 08:00 PM
Scored: 4
Views: 6,696

Reviewer: Rhett
Review Date: January 15, 2012

Format: DVD
Released by: Scorpion
Release date: January 24, 2012
MSRP: $14.95
Region 0
Progressive Scan
Widescreen 1.66:1 | 16x9: No

inline ImageJoan Collins sure had to pay her dues for fame. Before becoming a household name in the eighties as rich bitch Alexis Carrington in Dynasty, Collins had acted in over 70 different movies on both sides of the Atlantic. Sheís kind of like Sharon Stone where, despite playing significant roles in many productions, horror or otherwise, for several years, nobody really took notice until she landed the perfect role. Before that though, she sure had a lot of embarrassing ones, including the woman possessed by a sex offender midget in The Devil Within Her and one ravaged by giant ants in Empire of the Ants. After watching Revenge, Iím ready to add that one to the list, too.

The Story

inline ImageThe film begins at a funeral, where Jim (James Booth) and Carol Radford (Joan Collins) lead the procession for their dead daughter. Their little girl was raped and killed, and the lead suspect, Seely (Kenneth Griffith) gets out of any jail time on a technicality. Wasting no time contemplating morals or trying to go through the judicial system, Jim and his son Lee (Tom Marshall) decide instead to take matters into their own hands. One night after coming home from the candy store (no, he doesnít have a big brown panel van) Jimís gang attempt to kidnap Seely and almost botch the whole thing when their car wonít start and a dog decides to play tug of war with their blanket. How nobody in the crowded community does not witness the pandemonium is another question, but they end up getting Seely into the Radford cellar and proceed to beat him to the point where heís unresponsive. Justice hath been served.

inline ImageOr has it? Jim and Lee try to continue on unbeknownst to the women in their lives as they run the family business. They have a little drinkery attached to their home. Carol stumbles upon Jimís vigilante work and has to act quickly the next day when the delivery company wants to do their regular drop of liquor into their cellar. Carolís doing more than just concealing a dead pedophile though, because midway through her shift at the pub she sees the cellar door slowly rise and Seely try to make his escape. Heís alive! With the passion of revenge now subsided, Jim and his family must try and decide what they are to do with the man who took their daughterís life.

inline ImageThrough a number of circumstances, Seely remains cooped up in the cellar (apparently his glasses being broken is enough for him to abandon all survival instincts) and as the film nears its conclusion, weíre left to wonder if he really is the killer. See, Lee has been having trouble in bed with his girlfriend, and pretty much any film post-Psycho dictates that sexual repression or dysfunction turns people into killers. When Carol tries to console her step-son about it all, he lashes out in the cellar at the captive Seely and then proceeds to prove his manhood to the child murderer by raping his step-mom on the cellar floor. The movie still gets a little sleazier before finally revealing the true killer of the Garrison daughter followed by one final act of revenge.

inline ImageThere is something disingenuous about this movie, and about a lot of English-made horror films. Hammer was basically built on the audiences Universal cultivated for Dracula, Frankenstein and The Mummy, and the stories for their films were taken piecemeal from the Universal predecessors and their sequels. And then when Blow-up was a smash hit they made a bunch of weird cash-in swinging sixties thrillers like Straight on ĎTill Morning or Goodbye Gemini. With The Exorcist we got The Devil Within Her. And so on. While its early rape revenge story may seem a lot like The Virgin Spring, itís doubtful the filmmakers of Revenge were even aware of such cultured allegory. Iím guessing its genesis lies more with Straw Dogs, released the same year but largely publicized in Variety and such well before. Whatever its inspirations, Revenge just doesnít feel like an honest movie. When I say disingenuous I mean that the movie doesnít seem to really care about the characters or the themes therein, but more about hitting exploitable notes to draw an audience.

inline ImageA lot of what happens in Revenge had me just wondering ďWhy?Ē None of it seems to make much sense other than to try and get a rise out of the audience. The family chase down and beat this suspected rapist, but after the thrill of this so-called ďrevengeĒ they just kind of forget about the character and sloppily go about their business in order for there to be a lot of suspense with the possibilities of the rapist escaping or showing himself through the cellar to their bar patrons. Whatís even worse is that after that element has been exploited, the rapist doesnít even escape when the shoddy script gives him no real reason to still be down in the cellar. Heís completely free, but he doesnít try to escape because he broke his glasses. Really? Iíve seen movies where blind people traverse a lattice on the outside of a house to climb into the second floor and momentarily take out the killer without a weapon (Iím looking at you, My Soul To Take, you baffling beast of a film!). If a blind guy can do that, then surely a dude with, at worst, blurry vision, could make his way out of one of the two exists in the brightly lit cellar. But instead he stays, not because thatís what his character would do, but instead so the film can manipulate the audience into feeling sorry for the jellybean-buying pedo.

inline ImageAnd then thereís that ghastly scene where Joan Collins is raped by her son in the cellar while the rapist sheepishly watches. After enduring something as degrading and nonsensical as that, you have to wonder if Collins regarded the midget rape in The Devil Within Her a worthy step up for her career a few years later. The scene in question in Revenge is just a nasty one, and with little to no dramatic pretense. Lee is hardly developed as a character, and then one scene he has some sexual dysfunction and the very next one he is ripping the panties off his mom and forcing himself upon her. I appreciate depravity as much as the next guy, but this curveball definitely hits high and inside. Itís just not necessary, and instead something that reveals the petty ambitions of its makers, looking no more than to shock with expletives than to intrigue with tension or story.

inline ImageSo we watch the now innocent-looking captive squirm while Lee violates his own mother, the filmmakers forcing pathos towards a character weíve otherwise been led to believe is a rapist. So what happens next scene? Spoilers, if you care, but heís confirmed to be that very rapist and then killed off in the closing moments of the film. His character actions and arc make no sense, and thatís because he, like the rest of the people in this movie, is not a character but instead a pawn and a plot device. Revenge has no heart, no emotion, no suspense and no thought or style to really distinguish it from infinitely better comparable films like The Virgin Spring or The Last House on the Left. To speak in the terms of the bar owners of the film Ė this keg is flat.

Image Quality

inline ImageRevenge has an interesting mix of location and set footage, and both look quite good on this Scorpion transfer. While the color balance scene to scene might fluctuate between slight green or yellow hues, the colors on display are very vivid and lifelike. The scenes in the kitchen set, with the blue cupboards and all the red clothing that Collins is cleaning, appear particularly ripe. While there is still the odd white and black spec here and there, itís a surprisingly clean transfer too, cleaner than a lot of other Scorpion releases. One grip I have with this transfer, though, is the way theyíve handled the 1.66:1 aspect ratio. The best way to go to ensure the maximum resolution is to anamorphically encode the track in 16x9 and to add pillar boxes on either side of the frame. If you do it that way the resolution for the actual image would be about 786x480. The way it has been done here, by letterboxing a full frame 1.33:1 transfer, the resolution is only 640x390. It makes a difference, especially when youíre having to use the zoom function on your HDTV to rid yourself of the windowboxing that happens on all sides of the frame the way itís presented now. In short, the transfer is again top quality by Scorpion, but their formatting here is a problem.

Soundinline Image

For a cheap movie thatís fermented over 40 years now, itís quite amazing to not hear any hiss or playback noise whatsoever. The higher and lower frequencies seemed to have been chopped to achieve this, resulting in a slightly flatter mono track than weíre accustomed to with vintage titles, but it sure sounds clean. Sound effects come through sharp and dialogue is recorded well. Above average for its type.

Supplemental Material

inline ImageThere isnít much here, and I donít blame Scorpion either. All we get is another Katarina Nightmare Theater playback option with her patented introduction and short extro before some movie trailers for other Scorpion properties. Fun fact with the menu Ė it uses the Base 02 font, and since that font doesnít have an apostrophe the art design folks had to create it especially for the menus. Personally, I would have just used the comma and moved it up.

Final Thoughts

inline ImageProps to Joan Collins for slogging it out in shoddy productions all these years before Dynasty, and Revenge is probably the slog sheíd like to remember least. The production values are decent, but the material is calculated, empty and often in bad taste. I canít remember another movie where they actually have a scene of a child molester buying candy in earnest. The image and sound are both above average, although the choice to present the 1.66:1 aspect in full screen sacrifices some resolution. If you think there could never be a bad rape-revenge movie, well then, hereís Revenge on your naivety.


Movie - C-

Image Quality - B

Sound - B+

Supplements - D

Technical Info.
  • Colour
  • Running time - 1 hour and 32 minutes
  • Unrated
  • 1 Disc
  • Chapter Stops
  • English Dolby Digital 2.0

Supplemental Material
  • Katarina's Nightmare Theatre option
  • Katarina's trailers

Other Photos



New Article
New Reply

DVD Reviews N-Z
« Previous | Next »

Old 02-28-2012, 11:24 PM
I'm a fan of director Hayers quite a bit and overall enjoyed this thriller, I found it typical of his style but perhaps more violent than his other films. It's total sleaze for sure, but I do think it has a few good scenes of suspense. Like when the guy in the cellar tries to get out through the trap door in the bar, or the persisting workers wanting access to the wine cellar and bewildered get refused by an ever more insisting Collins. The acting's also quite good I think especially James Booth, and Sinead Cusack's one of the underrated 1970s beauties so genre fans should definitely check it out. Certainly not up there with things like Fright or even Straw Dogs of course, but still worth a look. I have the UK R2, same windowboxed picture but otherwise fine.
"What kind of half-ass operation is this?" (Chris Stone, The Howling, 1981).

Last edited by Yowie; 02-28-2012 at 11:27 PM..
Old 03-03-2012, 08:36 AM
Revenge has aired numerous times here in Australia on the ABC over the last few decades and I've always enjoyed it, grimy little sleaze-fest that it is. Strangely enough, the incest never bothered me much, unlike in Amityville II, where I found it thoroughly repulsive. Yeah I know - go figure! I'm actually pretty sure it aired quite recently and that I PVR'd it, so I must revisit it soon.

FWIW though, if you're so short sighted as to be almost blind without your glasses (as I am), it can be really disorienting to not have them on, not to mention headache inducing!

Last edited by startide; 03-03-2012 at 08:41 AM..

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Main > Reviews > DVD Reviews N-Z
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Portal By vbPortal Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vbPortal. All Rights Reserved.